H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Halle Cioffi vs Nana Smith H2H: 1-0

Halle Cioffi holds a 1–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Halle Cioffi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Halle Cioffi won the 1990 Boca Raton round of 64 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Halle Cioffi
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nana Smith
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Halle Cioffi #51 6-3 6-3 Nana Smith #89 Match data Mar 7, 1990* R64 Boca Raton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Halle Cioffi #767 #31 26 1,765 88 98 47.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Halle Cioffi Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1985 6–2 75.0% — 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1986 2–3 40.0% #147 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1987 16–13 55.2% #55 1,673 0 1 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 1988 14–15 48.3% #47 1,689 0 1 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1989 17–13 56.7% #50 1,710 0 1 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 1990 9–14 39.1% #111 1,655 0 1 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 1991 14–17 45.2% #87 1,649 0 1 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1992 10–16 38.5% #95 1,643 0 1 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1993 0–5 0.0% #348 1,559 0 1 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Halle Cioffi Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1986 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1988 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1989 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1990 7 12 19 36.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1991 7 10 17 41.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1992 3 9 12 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 0 9 9 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 52 59 111 46.8% 27 27 54 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Halle Cioffi Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1985 1550 107.3 — — — — — — — 63.2% +1.11 3–0 (100%) — — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1986 1532 100.6 — — — — +40 — — 40.0% -0.10 — — — +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1674 122.2 — — — — -1 -83 — 49.2% -0.26 5–2 (71%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.15 1988 1496 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
18 1988 1690 131.0 — — — — -14 -40 — 49.2% -0.25 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 97.8 -1.17 1989 1588 139.3 — — — — +6 — — 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1989 1710 128.2 — — — — -6 -30 — 52.7% +0.11 9–5 (64%) 1–1 — +0.21 1990 1541 113.3 — — — — +33 — -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 1990 1655 131.1 — — — — -9 — — 43.4% -0.70 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 -0.35 1991 1529 118.1 — — — — +48 — — 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.61
21 1991 1650 132.0 — — — — -9 +87 — 49.3% -0.04 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 99.9 -1.22 1992 1557 108.5 — — — — +41 — — 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.97
22 1992 1643 129.6 — — — — -40 +97 — 41.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 99.4 -1.00 1993 1444 90.0 — — — — +16 — — 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1993 1559 88.2 — — — — -19 — — 9.1% -3.09 0–1 0–1 — +0.13 1994 1579 128.2 — — — — -1 — — 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.70
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1545 112.9 — — — — 0 — -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1602 121.7 — — — — +24 — — 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1543 108.6 — — — — +33 — — 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1538 116.7 — — — — +45 — — 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — -0.13
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1522 112.5 — — — — +37 — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.63
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1499 99.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.03
Career — 1766 131.8 — — — — -10 +17 — 47.3% -0.30 30–27 (53%) 12–12 (50%) 102.5 -1.04 — 1650 124.0 — — — — +23 — -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.