H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Halle Cioffi vs Nana Smith H2H: 1-0
Halle Cioffi holds a 1–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Halle Cioffi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Halle Cioffi won the 1990 Boca Raton second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1990* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Halle Cioffi | 6-3 6-3 | Nana Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Halle Cioffi | #767 | #31 | 26 | 1,765 | 88 | 98 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Halle Cioffi | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #95 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |