H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Hana Strachonova vs Iris Riedel Kuhn H2H: 1-0

Hana Strachonova holds a 1–0 lead over Iris Riedel Kuhn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hana Strachonova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hana Strachonova won the 1980 Roland Garros round of 32 1-6 6-3 6-2.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hana Strachonova 1-6 6-3 6-2 Iris Riedel Kuhn Match data Jun 1, 1980* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hana Strachonova — — — 1,758 54 69 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Iris Riedel Kuhn — — — 1,841 106 98 52.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hana Strachonova Iris Riedel Kuhn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1977 3–5 37.5% — 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1978 16–16 50.0% — 1,641 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1979 4–8 33.3% — 1,644 0 1 1972 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0
19 1980 15–15 50.0% — 1,674 0 1 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
20 1981 11–13 45.8% — 1,674 0 1 1974 2–4 33.3% — 1,490 0 0
21 1982 3–7 30.0% — 1,615 0 1 1975 16–13 55.2% — 1,684 0 0
22 1983 2–5 28.6% — 1,608 0 1 1976 10–15 40.0% — 1,679 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1977 13–14 48.1% — 1,706 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1978 14–11 56.0% — 1,691 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1979 5–9 35.7% — 1,683 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1980 29–10 74.4% — 1,817 0 4
27 — — — — — — — 1981 15–13 53.6% — 1,729 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 1982 1–6 14.3% — 1,626 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hana Strachonova Iris Riedel Kuhn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1977 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1974 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 1 10 11 9.1% 29 29 58 50.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 10 15 25 40.0% — 2 6 8 25.0% 81 62 143 56.6% 3 8 11 27.3% 9 16 25 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hana Strachonova Iris Riedel Kuhn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1977 1530 108.2 — — — — +63 +15 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.2 +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 1641 118.6 — — — — -70 -42 -15 47.3% -0.27 7–3 (70%) 1–3 (25%) 104.4 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 1645 123.8 — — — — -40 — -17 35.7% -1.32 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.40 1972 1485 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 — 1–0 — +0.36
19 1980 1675 124.9 — — — — -86 +65 -85 47.1% -0.44 7–3 (70%) 3–4 (43%) 105.7 +0.32 1973 1479 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.13
20 1981 1675 126.4 — — — — -125 +147 — 43.1% -0.43 6–4 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 102.4 -1.29 1974 1491 113.8 — — — — — +14 — 45.5% -0.64 0–1 — — +0.29
21 1982 1616 100.5 — — — — — +76 — 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) — — -0.34 1975 1685 137.0 — — — — -42 +13 — 53.7% +0.22 7–6 (54%) 5–3 (63%) 104.4 -0.63
22 1983 1609 111.6 — — — — — +122 — 29.4% -1.88 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.10 1976 1680 125.4 — — — — -69 +22 — 41.4% -0.64 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — -0.95
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1707 135.3 — — — — -155 +70 — 48.4% -0.23 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.3 -1.03
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1691 124.0 — — — — -96 -7 -169 58.6% +0.90 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 92.7 +2.72
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1683 123.5 — — — — — +35 — 41.9% -1.35 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — -1.43
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1817 139.2 — — — — -277 +141 — 72.0% +1.85 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.0 +2.39
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1730 122.0 — — — — — +229 — 51.7% -0.26 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 103.5 -0.20
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1627 97.1 — — — — — +128 — 29.4% -1.12 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.28
Career — 1758 125.0 — — — — -58 +77 -26 43.4% -0.61 27–17 (61%) 11–14 (44%) 106.2 -0.19 — 1842 135.6 — — — — -114 +86 -169 52.7% +0.15 28–34 (45%) 14–12 (54%) 97.9 +0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.