H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Hana Strachonova vs Joyce Portman H2H: 1-0

Hana Strachonova holds a 1–0 lead over Joyce Portman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hana Strachonova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hana Strachonova won the 1981 Amelia Island Championships round of 64 7-6 3-6 6-3.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hana Strachonova 7-6 3-6 6-3 Joyce Portman Match data Apr 22, 1981* R64 Amelia Island Championships WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hana Strachonova — — — 1,758 54 69 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Joyce Portman — — — 1,650 17 30 36.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hana Strachonova Joyce Portman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1977 3–5 37.5% — 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1978 16–16 50.0% — 1,641 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1979 4–8 33.3% — 1,644 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1980 15–15 50.0% — 1,674 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1981 11–13 45.8% — 1,674 0 1 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
21 1982 3–7 30.0% — 1,615 0 1 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
22 1983 2–5 28.6% — 1,608 0 1 1980 6–9 40.0% — 1,520 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1981 10–17 37.0% — 1,547 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,534 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hana Strachonova Joyce Portman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1977 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1980 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 3 7 10 30.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 1 10 11 9.1% 29 29 58 50.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 10 15 25 40.0% — 4 12 16 25.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hana Strachonova Joyce Portman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1977 1530 108.2 — — — — +63 +15 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.2 +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 1641 118.6 — — — — -70 -42 -15 47.3% -0.27 7–3 (70%) 1–3 (25%) 104.4 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 1645 123.8 — — — — -40 — -17 35.7% -1.32 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1675 124.9 — — — — -86 +65 -85 47.1% -0.44 7–3 (70%) 3–4 (43%) 105.7 +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 1675 126.4 — — — — -125 +147 — 43.1% -0.43 6–4 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 102.4 -1.29 1978 1485 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08
21 1982 1616 100.5 — — — — — +76 — 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) — — -0.34 1979 1504 114.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — -0.10
22 1983 1609 111.6 — — — — — +122 — 29.4% -1.88 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.10 1980 1521 109.4 — — — — -36 +64 — 44.1% -0.91 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.32
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1548 121.7 — — — — -64 +139 — 43.1% -0.41 1–6 (14%) 0–3 (0%) 92.6 +0.87
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1534 90.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.25 — — — -0.31
Career — 1758 125.0 — — — — -58 +77 -26 43.4% -0.61 27–17 (61%) 11–14 (44%) 106.2 -0.19 — 1650 115.9 — — — — -53 +125 — 41.2% -0.75 2–9 (18%) 1–4 (20%) 91.6 +0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.