H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Hana Strachonova vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-0

Hana Strachonova holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hana Strachonova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hana Strachonova won the 1979 Seattle round of 32 7-6(10-8) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hana Strachonova
SUI Age 65
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 74

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hana Strachonova 7-6(10-8) 6-4 Kate Latham Match data Feb 8, 1979* R32 Seattle WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hana Strachonova — — — 1,758 54 69 43.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kate Latham — — — 1,865 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hana Strachonova Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1977 3–5 37.5% — 1,530 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1978 16–16 50.0% — 1,641 0 1 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1979 4–8 33.3% — 1,644 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1980 15–15 50.0% — 1,674 0 1 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1981 11–13 45.8% — 1,674 0 1 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1982 3–7 30.0% — 1,615 0 1 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1983 2–5 28.6% — 1,608 0 1 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 — — — — — — — 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,749 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,662 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,853 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,775 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,685 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,624 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,493 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,527 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hana Strachonova Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1977 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 1 10 11 9.1% 29 29 58 50.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 10 15 25 40.0% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hana Strachonova Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1977 1530 108.2 — — — — +63 +15 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 98.2 +0.99 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1978 1641 118.6 — — — — -70 -42 -15 47.3% -0.27 7–3 (70%) 1–3 (25%) 104.4 +1.59 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1979 1645 123.8 — — — — -40 — -17 35.7% -1.32 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1675 124.9 — — — — -86 +65 -85 47.1% -0.44 7–3 (70%) 3–4 (43%) 105.7 +0.32 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.61
20 1981 1675 126.4 — — — — -125 +147 — 43.1% -0.43 6–4 (60%) 4–3 (57%) 102.4 -1.29 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1982 1616 100.5 — — — — — +76 — 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) — — -0.34 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.17
22 1983 1609 111.6 — — — — — +122 — 29.4% -1.88 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.10 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.71
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.34
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1750 140.9 — — — — -8 -120 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -1.23
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1663 118.4 — — — — +3 -12 +67 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +1.97
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1853 149.7 — — — — -20 -164 -98 46.0% -0.27 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 -2.28
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1750 133.2 — — — — -27 — +15 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.93
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1776 142.9 — — — — -18 — +4 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.97
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1686 128.3 — — — — +50 -103 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.20
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.1 — — — — +52 -49 +72 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.86
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1493 91.7 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 1758 125.0 — — — — -58 +77 -26 43.4% -0.61 27–17 (61%) 11–14 (44%) 106.2 -0.19 — 1866 138.2 — — — — -3 -78 -9 49.2% -0.03 56–61 (48%) 41–38 (52%) 101.2 +0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.