H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Heather Crowe vs Kate Glancy H2H: 1-0

Heather Crowe holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Glancy in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Heather Crowe won the 1982 Erie round of 32 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Heather Crowe
USA Age 65
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Glancy
CAN Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Heather Crowe 7-5 6-1 Kate Glancy Match data Jul 22, 1982* R32 Erie WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heather Crowe — — — 1,621 12 13 48.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kate Glancy — — — 1,582 20 35 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heather Crowe Kate Glancy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1975 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1977 1–3 25.0% — 1,459 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1978 1–4 20.0% — 1,461 0 0
20 1982 12–6 66.7% — 1,613 0 1 1980 1–5 16.7% — 1,422 0 0
21 1983 0–5 0.0% — 1,541 0 1 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,423 0 0
22 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,537 0 1 1982 14–15 48.3% — 1,455 0 0
23 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,530 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heather Crowe Kate Glancy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1983 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
23 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — 4 10 14 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heather Crowe Kate Glancy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1492 95.3 — — — — — +24 — 33.3% -2.00 — — — +0.30
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1476 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.39
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1460 103.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 — — +0.25
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1461 102.2 — — — — +124 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 — — +0.21
20 1982 1613 115.0 — — — — -22 — — 62.2% +0.59 2–1 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 105.6 +0.39 1980 1422 87.2 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.75 — — — +0.30
21 1983 1542 94.7 — — — — — — — 23.1% -1.23 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.10 1981 1423 99.0 — — — — +111 — — 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — +0.44
22 1984 1537 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.21 1982 1455 107.3 — — — — +26 +101 — 46.2% -0.15 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 106.0 +3.49
23 1985 1530 101.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1621 107.7 — — — — -22 — — 48.1% -0.24 2–4 (33%) 5–1 (83%) 99.9 +0.58 — 1582 100.7 — — — — +69 +89 — 37.2% -0.95 6–5 (55%) 2–2 (50%) 103.9 +9.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.