H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Heather Ludloff vs Annabel Croft H2H: 0-1

Annabel Croft holds a 1–0 lead over Heather Ludloff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Annabel Croft won the 1985 Melbourne round of 16 5-7 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Heather Ludloff
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Annabel Croft
GBR Age 60

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Annabel Croft 5-7 6-2 6-2 Heather Ludloff Match data May 17, 1985* R16 Melbourne WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heather Ludloff #512 #69 11 1,575 48 106 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annabel Croft — — — 1,780 84 92 47.7% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heather Ludloff Annabel Croft
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 9–5 64.3% — 1,535 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1982 14–9 60.9% — 1,588 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1983 6–7 46.2% — 1,595 0 0
17 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1984 11–14 44.0% — 1,615 0 0
18 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1985 23–20 53.5% — 1,761 0 1
19 1980 2–5 28.6% — 1,465 0 0 1986 10–19 34.5% — 1,653 0 1
20 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,440 0 0 1987 8–14 36.4% — 1,574 0 1
21 1982 3–4 42.9% — 1,473 0 0 1988 3–3 50.0% — 1,562 0 1
22 1983 7–15 31.8% — 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1984 6–9 40.0% #129 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1985 2–12 14.3% #127 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1986 0–1 0.0% #192 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1987 12–16 42.9% #74 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1988 6–14 30.0% #123 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1989 4–9 30.8% #164 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1990 2–6 25.0% #219 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1991 3–5 37.5% #141 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1992 1–6 14.3% #282 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heather Ludloff Annabel Croft
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1978 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
18 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7%
19 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
20 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1988 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1983 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1988 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 51 71 28.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 7 17 24 29.2% — 32 29 61 52.5% 13 19 32 40.6% 15 27 42 35.7% 11 12 23 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heather Ludloff Annabel Croft
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.31
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1535 118.4 — — — — — — +47 57.7% +1.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.81
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1589 120.1 — — — — — +11 -34 62.5% +1.17 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +2.10
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1595 118.1 — — — — -29 — +1 50.0% -0.07 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.87
17 1978 1488 88.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.21 1984 1615 118.2 — — — — -3 -7 -8 46.4% -0.14 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.5 +0.33
18 1979 1483 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.05 1985 1762 133.2 — — — — +72 -225 -211 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.5 +0.98
19 1980 1465 105.1 — — — — +53 — — 37.5% -0.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.22 1986 1653 120.6 — — — — +70 -91 -160 38.2% -1.06 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.89
20 1981 1441 97.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.27 1987 1575 108.2 — — — — +47 — -109 42.3% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.2 +0.97
21 1982 1473 106.3 — — — — +70 — — 46.7% -0.27 0–1 — — +0.83 1988 1562 97.6 — — — — +29 — — 42.9% -0.50 2–0 2–2 (50%) — +0.72
22 1983 1515 109.9 — — — — +14 — +43 34.7% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 1546 102.7 — — — — -41 — +67 41.9% -1.26 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 1488 104.3 — — — — -35 — +74 22.6% -2.29 0–3 (0%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 1474 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 1542 110.3 — — — — -48 — +54 43.3% -0.72 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 104.8 +2.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1988 1504 112.8 — — — — -63 — +65 36.2% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 93.9 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 1468 103.4 — — — — +3 — +51 35.5% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1457 97.4 — — — — -10 — +67 26.3% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1503 120.4 — — — — -99 — +132 35.0% -1.40 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1473 105.8 — — — — -96 — +134 29.4% -1.47 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1576 110.5 — — — — -27 — +69 35.5% -1.20 19–30 (39%) 22–18 (55%) 102.5 +5.16 — 1780 125.1 — — — — +50 -68 -71 48.1% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 15–20 (43%) 92.1 +3.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.