H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Heather Ludloff vs Christina Singer H2H: 1-0

Heather Ludloff holds a 1–0 lead over Christina Singer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Heather Ludloff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Heather Ludloff won the 1988 Los Angeles round of 64 6-4 6-4.

USA Age 65 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
GER Age 58 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Heather Ludloff #116 6-4 6-4 Christina Singer #79 Match data Aug 10, 1988* R64 Los Angeles Category 5 modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heather Ludloff #512 #69 11 1,575 48 106 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christina Singer #892 #41 163 1,738 56 86 39.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heather Ludloff Christina Singer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1978 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0 1986 1–1 50.0% #163 1,506 0 0
18 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,483 0 0 1987 7–8 46.7% #85 1,557 0 0
19 1980 2–5 28.6% 1,465 0 0 1988 4–12 25.0% #160 1,487 0 0
20 1981 0–2 0.0% 1,440 0 0 1989 1–4 20.0% #264 1,448 0 0
21 1982 3–4 42.9% 1,473 0 0
22 1983 7–15 31.8% 1,514 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% #199 1,434 0 0
23 1984 6–9 40.0% #129 1,545 0 0
24 1985 2–12 14.3% #127 1,488 0 0 1993 10–13 43.5% #80 1,564 0 0
25 1986 0–1 0.0% #192 1,473 0 0 1994 10–15 40.0% #77 1,615 0 0
26 1987 12–16 42.9% #74 1,542 0 0 1995 17–16 51.5% #54 1,708 0 0
27 1988 6–14 30.0% #123 1,504 0 0 1996 6–15 28.6% #136 1,581 0 0
28 1989 4–9 30.8% #164 1,468 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #504 1,568 0 0
29 1990 2–6 25.0% #219 1,456 0 0
30 1991 3–5 37.5% #141 1,502 0 0
31 1992 1–6 14.3% #282 1,472 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heather Ludloff Christina Singer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 1 6 7 14.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1983 3 6 9 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1985 0 5 5 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1987 2 6 8 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1988 3 8 11 27.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 20 51 71 28.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 7 17 24 29.2% 24 37 61 39.3% 7 24 31 22.6% 16 13 29 55.2% 9 12 21 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heather Ludloff Christina Singer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1978 1488 88.8 0.0% -6.00 +0.21 1986 1507 99.7 40.0% -1.20 1–0 +0.24
18 1979 1483 102.7 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.05 1987 1558 114.7 +60 -20 42.4% -0.33 3–0 (100%) 2–3 (40%) 104.0 +1.17
19 1980 1465 105.1 +53 37.5% -0.50 0–2 1–0 +0.22 1988 1488 107.6 +35 0 +99 28.6% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 0–2 +1.48
20 1981 1441 97.7 20.0% -2.00 0–1 +0.27 1989 1449 92.5 -4 18.2% -2.36 1–0 0–1 +0.84
21 1982 1473 106.3 +70 46.7% -0.27 0–1 +0.83
22 1983 1515 109.9 +14 +43 34.7% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 +0.12 1991 1435 95.3 0.0% -3.00 +0.15
23 1984 1546 102.7 -41 +67 41.9% -1.26 2–1 (67%) 1–0 +0.91
24 1985 1488 104.3 -35 +74 22.6% -2.29 0–3 (0%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +0.47 1993 1564 129.1 +59 -131 44.0% -0.56 2–2 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 103.0 +0.51
25 1986 1474 99.0 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.19 1994 1616 129.7 +55 -196 -15 40.0% -0.82 6–4 (60%) 0–2 +0.29
26 1987 1542 110.3 -48 +54 43.3% -0.72 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 104.8 +2.85 1995 1709 128.0 -57 -277 +23 50.0% -0.33 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -0.60
27 1988 1504 112.8 -63 +65 36.2% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 93.9 +0.36 1996 1582 110.5 -22 +191 34.0% -1.20 3–5 (38%) 1–0 +0.09
28 1989 1468 103.4 +3 +51 35.5% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 2–0 +1.53 1997 1568 100.8 0.0% -2.50 0–1 +0.14
29 1990 1457 97.4 -10 +67 26.3% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 1–0 +0.40
30 1991 1503 120.4 -99 +132 35.0% -1.40 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.37
31 1992 1473 105.8 -96 +134 29.4% -1.47 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +0.01
Career 1576 110.5 -27 +69 35.5% -1.20 19–30 (39%) 22–18 (55%) 102.5 +5.16 1738 124.4 +15 -81 +66 39.7% -0.82 21–15 (58%) 11–12 (48%) 105.4 +3.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.