H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Heather Ludloff vs Emiko Okagawa H2H: 1-0

Heather Ludloff holds a 1–0 lead over Emiko Okagawa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Heather Ludloff leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Heather Ludloff won the 1987 Australian Open round of 128 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Heather Ludloff
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Emiko Okagawa
JPN Age 61

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Heather Ludloff #172 7-5 6-3 Emiko Okagawa Match data Jan 14, 1987* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heather Ludloff #512 #69 11 1,575 48 106 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Emiko Okagawa — — — 1,523 18 39 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heather Ludloff Emiko Okagawa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,482 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0
17 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,480 0 0
18 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1983 0–2 0.0% — 1,454 0 0
19 1980 2–5 28.6% — 1,465 0 0 1984 5–6 45.5% — 1,473 0 0
20 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,440 0 0 1985 1–8 11.1% — 1,437 0 0
21 1982 3–4 42.9% — 1,473 0 0 1986 3–5 37.5% — 1,458 0 0
22 1983 7–15 31.8% — 1,514 0 0 1987 4–6 40.0% — 1,487 0 0
23 1984 6–9 40.0% #129 1,545 0 0 1988 3–4 42.9% — 1,488 0 0
24 1985 2–12 14.3% #127 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1986 0–1 0.0% #192 1,473 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,474 0 0
26 1987 12–16 42.9% #74 1,542 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0
27 1988 6–14 30.0% #123 1,504 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,447 0 0
28 1989 4–9 30.8% #164 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1990 2–6 25.0% #219 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1991 3–5 37.5% #141 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1992 1–6 14.3% #282 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heather Ludloff Emiko Okagawa
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1983 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1987 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1984 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1985 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1988 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 51 71 28.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 7 17 24 29.2% — 12 22 34 35.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heather Ludloff Emiko Okagawa
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — +0.30
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1476 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02
17 1978 1488 88.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.21 1982 1481 93.6 — — — — +51 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — -0.03
18 1979 1483 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.05 1983 1454 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.41
19 1980 1465 105.1 — — — — +53 — — 37.5% -0.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.22 1984 1474 103.8 — — — — +63 +71 — 50.0% -0.31 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +1.75
20 1981 1441 97.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.27 1985 1437 95.8 — — — — +60 +70 — 15.0% -2.70 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
21 1982 1473 106.3 — — — — +70 — — 46.7% -0.27 0–1 — — +0.83 1986 1458 103.7 — — — — +45 — — 45.0% -0.20 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.89
22 1983 1515 109.9 — — — — +14 — +43 34.7% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 +0.12 1987 1487 97.6 — — — — +53 — — 38.1% -1.48 1–0 5–0 (100%) — +1.14
23 1984 1546 102.7 — — — — -41 — +67 41.9% -1.26 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.91 1988 1489 93.8 — — — — +24 — — 42.9% -1.21 — 1–0 — +1.03
24 1985 1488 104.3 — — — — -35 — +74 22.6% -2.29 0–3 (0%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 1474 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.19 1990 1474 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.10
26 1987 1542 110.3 — — — — -48 — +54 43.3% -0.72 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 104.8 +2.85 1991 1458 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.22
27 1988 1504 112.8 — — — — -63 — +65 36.2% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 93.9 +0.36 1992 1447 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06
28 1989 1468 103.4 — — — — +3 — +51 35.5% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1457 97.4 — — — — -10 — +67 26.3% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1503 120.4 — — — — -99 — +132 35.0% -1.40 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1473 105.8 — — — — -96 — +134 29.4% -1.47 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1576 110.5 — — — — -27 — +69 35.5% -1.20 19–30 (39%) 22–18 (55%) 102.5 +5.16 — 1524 94.4 — — — — +49 +71 — 35.2% -1.34 5–9 (36%) 10–3 (77%) 103.8 +10.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.