H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Heather Ludloff vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 1-0
Heather Ludloff holds a 1–0 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Heather Ludloff leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Heather Ludloff won the 1992 Eastbourne second round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1992* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Heather Ludloff | 7-6 6-3 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heather Ludloff | #512 | #69 | 11 | 1,576 | 48 | 106 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Heather Ludloff | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #219 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |