H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Heather Ludloff vs Grace Kim H2H: 1-0

Heather Ludloff holds a 1–0 lead over Grace Kim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Heather Ludloff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Heather Ludloff won the 1987 Indianapolis round of 64 6-4 1-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Heather Ludloff
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Grace Kim
USA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Heather Ludloff #73 6-4 1-6 6-1 Grace Kim Match data Oct 27, 1987* R64 Indianapolis WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heather Ludloff #512 #69 11 1,575 48 106 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grace Kim — — — 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heather Ludloff Grace Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1982 7–3 70.0% — 1,585 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1983 2–4 33.3% — 1,591 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1984 6–10 37.5% — 1,622 0 1
17 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1985 17–25 40.5% — 1,694 0 1
18 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1986 10–22 31.2% — 1,605 0 1
19 1980 2–5 28.6% — 1,465 0 0 1987 5–13 27.8% — 1,515 0 1
20 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,440 0 0 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,469 0 1
21 1982 3–4 42.9% — 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1983 7–15 31.8% — 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1984 6–9 40.0% #129 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1985 2–12 14.3% #127 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1986 0–1 0.0% #192 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1987 12–16 42.9% #74 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1988 6–14 30.0% #123 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1989 4–9 30.8% #164 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1990 2–6 25.0% #219 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1991 3–5 37.5% #141 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1992 1–6 14.3% #282 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heather Ludloff Grace Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1978 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 11 12 23 47.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3%
19 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1983 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1988 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 51 71 28.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 7 17 24 29.2% — 28 35 63 44.4% 4 18 22 18.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 18 29 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heather Ludloff Grace Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1586 114.0 — — — — +73 — — 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.42
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1592 115.9 — — — — +65 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1622 113.8 — — — — +26 — +18 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.48
17 1978 1488 88.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.21 1985 1694 125.2 — — — — +52 -205 -135 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.64
18 1979 1483 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.05 1986 1605 117.7 — — — — +47 -126 — 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +0.32
19 1980 1465 105.1 — — — — +53 — — 37.5% -0.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.22 1987 1515 97.7 — — — — +45 — -17 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +2.17
20 1981 1441 97.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.27 1988 1469 96.4 — — — — — -61 — 0.0% -3.90 — 0–1 — -0.26
21 1982 1473 106.3 — — — — +70 — — 46.7% -0.27 0–1 — — +0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1983 1515 109.9 — — — — +14 — +43 34.7% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1984 1546 102.7 — — — — -41 — +67 41.9% -1.26 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1985 1488 104.3 — — — — -35 — +74 22.6% -2.29 0–3 (0%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 1474 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 1542 110.3 — — — — -48 — +54 43.3% -0.72 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 104.8 +2.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1988 1504 112.8 — — — — -63 — +65 36.2% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 93.9 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 1468 103.4 — — — — +3 — +51 35.5% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1457 97.4 — — — — -10 — +67 26.3% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1503 120.4 — — — — -99 — +132 35.0% -1.40 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1473 105.8 — — — — -96 — +134 29.4% -1.47 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1576 110.5 — — — — -27 — +69 35.5% -1.20 19–30 (39%) 22–18 (55%) 102.5 +5.16 — 1705 119.1 — — — — +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.93

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.