H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Heather Ludloff vs Jill Hetherington H2H: 0-2

Jill Hetherington holds a 2–0 lead over Heather Ludloff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jill Hetherington leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Hetherington won the 1989 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-1 6-1.

USA Age 65 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
CAN Age 61 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jill Hetherington #128 6-1 6-1 Heather Ludloff #174 Match data Mar 21, 1989* R128 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard
Jill Hetherington #145 6-4 6-7 6-1 Heather Ludloff #177 Match data Feb 23, 1989* R32 Oakland WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heather Ludloff #512 #69 11 1,575 48 106 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jill Hetherington #748 #64 12 1,645 31 58 34.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heather Ludloff Jill Hetherington
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1978 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0
18 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,483 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% 1,507 0 0
19 1980 2–5 28.6% 1,465 0 0 1984 2–2 50.0% #121 1,543 0 0
20 1981 0–2 0.0% 1,440 0 0 1985 0–2 0.0% #118 1,522 0 0
21 1982 3–4 42.9% 1,473 0 0 1986 1–1 50.0% #386 1,536 0 0
22 1983 7–15 31.8% 1,514 0 0 1987 2–4 33.3% #169 1,534 0 0
23 1984 6–9 40.0% #129 1,545 0 0 1988 15–19 44.1% #81 1,573 0 1
24 1985 2–12 14.3% #127 1,488 0 0 1989 8–17 32.0% #122 1,532 0 1
25 1986 0–1 0.0% #192 1,473 0 0 1990 1–6 14.3% #247 1,482 0 1
26 1987 12–16 42.9% #74 1,542 0 0 1991 0–1 0.0% #245 1,475 0 1
27 1988 6–14 30.0% #123 1,504 0 0 1992 1–3 25.0% #277 1,458 0 1
28 1989 4–9 30.8% #164 1,468 0 0 1993 0–2 0.0% #468 1,437 0 1
29 1990 2–6 25.0% #219 1,456 0 0
30 1991 3–5 37.5% #141 1,502 0 0
31 1992 1–6 14.3% #282 1,472 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heather Ludloff Jill Hetherington
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1978 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1983 3 6 9 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
24 1985 0 5 5 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1987 2 6 8 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1988 3 8 11 27.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1993 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 20 51 71 28.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 7 17 24 29.2% 24 42 66 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heather Ludloff Jill Hetherington
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1978 1488 88.8 0.0% -6.00 +0.21
18 1979 1483 102.7 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.05 1983 1507 98.2 50.0% -0.67 1–1 +0.39
19 1980 1465 105.1 +53 37.5% -0.50 0–2 1–0 +0.22 1984 1543 109.8 +46 54.5% +0.64 1–2 (33%) 0–1 -0.28
20 1981 1441 97.7 20.0% -2.00 0–1 +0.27 1985 1523 106.3 20.0% -1.20 0–1 1–2 (33%) -0.21
21 1982 1473 106.3 +70 46.7% -0.27 0–1 +0.83 1986 1537 105.8 50.0% -1.25 1–0 +0.01
22 1983 1515 109.9 +14 +43 34.7% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 +0.12 1987 1534 111.8 +29 33.3% -0.17 2–0 0–3 (0%) +0.14
23 1984 1546 102.7 -41 +67 41.9% -1.26 2–1 (67%) 1–0 +0.91 1988 1573 119.5 +34 -38 46.9% -0.23 5–8 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 98.9 +1.57
24 1985 1488 104.3 -35 +74 22.6% -2.29 0–3 (0%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +0.47 1989 1532 113.9 -43 +52 36.8% -0.89 2–5 (29%) 3–3 (50%) 97.3 +0.78
25 1986 1474 99.0 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.19 1990 1482 97.6 -40 25.0% -1.63 0–2 +0.39
26 1987 1542 110.3 -48 +54 43.3% -0.72 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 104.8 +2.85 1991 1476 101.6 33.3% -1.33 0–1 0–1 -0.05
27 1988 1504 112.8 -63 +65 36.2% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 93.9 +0.36 1992 1459 96.2 40.0% -1.10 0–2 +0.64
28 1989 1468 103.4 +3 +51 35.5% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 2–0 +1.53 1993 1438 95.4 0.0% -3.25 0.00
29 1990 1457 97.4 -10 +67 26.3% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 1–0 +0.40
30 1991 1503 120.4 -99 +132 35.0% -1.40 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.37
31 1992 1473 105.8 -96 +134 29.4% -1.47 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +0.01
Career 1576 110.5 -27 +69 35.5% -1.20 19–30 (39%) 22–18 (55%) 102.5 +5.16 1645 115.3 -1 +29 -5 40.2% -0.64 11–22 (33%) 9–14 (39%) 91.7 +3.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.