H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Heather Ludloff vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 1-0

Heather Ludloff holds a 1–0 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Heather Ludloff leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Heather Ludloff won the 1983 Eastbourne Open round of 64 3-6 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Heather Ludloff
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Heather Ludloff 3-6 7-6 6-1 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Jun 15, 1983* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heather Ludloff #512 #69 11 1,575 48 106 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — #9 — 2,082 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heather Ludloff Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,802 0 2
15 — — — — — — — 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,872 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,844 0 2
17 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,851 0 2
18 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,975 0 3
19 1980 2–5 28.6% — 1,465 0 0 1986 34–16 68.0% #9 1,974 0 4
20 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,440 0 0 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,901 0 4
21 1982 3–4 42.9% — 1,473 0 0 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,811 0 4
22 1983 7–15 31.8% — 1,514 0 0 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,788 0 4
23 1984 6–9 40.0% #129 1,545 0 0 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,697 0 4
24 1985 2–12 14.3% #127 1,488 0 0 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,589 0 4
25 1986 0–1 0.0% #192 1,473 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4
26 1987 12–16 42.9% #74 1,542 0 0 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,628 0 4
27 1988 6–14 30.0% #123 1,504 0 0 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,585 0 4
28 1989 4–9 30.8% #164 1,468 0 0 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,609 0 4
29 1990 2–6 25.0% #219 1,456 0 0 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,554 0 4
30 1991 3–5 37.5% #141 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1992 1–6 14.3% #282 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heather Ludloff Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 8 5 13 61.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1978 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 6 3 9 66.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
18 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 15 5 20 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
19 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1983 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1984 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1985 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 5 8 13 38.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1987 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1988 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 51 71 28.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 7 17 24 29.2% — 99 84 183 54.1% 98 59 157 62.4% 27 24 51 52.9% 49 43 92 53.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heather Ludloff Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1505 105.8 — — — — — — — 42.1% -0.42 1–0 1–1 — -0.05
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1803 134.8 — — — — -10 -130 -221 61.5% +1.17 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +2.37
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1872 149.0 — — — — -69 -6 -215 60.4% +0.54 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 107.8 -4.11
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1845 139.2 — — — — -45 +103 -185 58.6% +0.96 12–7 (63%) 1–7 (13%) 99.3 +3.06
17 1978 1488 88.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.21 1984 1851 137.1 — — — — -38 +58 -143 55.9% +0.22 9–5 (64%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.60
18 1979 1483 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.05 1985 1976 158.8 — — — — -30 -57 -101 70.6% +1.53 9–2 (82%) 3–5 (38%) 105.7 -2.76
19 1980 1465 105.1 — — — — +53 — — 37.5% -0.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.22 1986 1975 157.9 — — — — -2 +51 — 63.6% +1.08 8–6 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 101.3 -3.03
20 1981 1441 97.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.27 1987 1902 131.1 — — — — +35 +51 — 61.4% +0.60 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 100.0 -0.03
21 1982 1473 106.3 — — — — +70 — — 46.7% -0.27 0–1 — — +0.83 1988 1812 123.2 — — — — +51 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -1.23
22 1983 1515 109.9 — — — — +14 — +43 34.7% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 +0.12 1989 1788 141.2 — — — — +17 +110 -20 50.0% -0.29 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 -4.08
23 1984 1546 102.7 — — — — -41 — +67 41.9% -1.26 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.91 1990 1698 132.2 — — — — +65 +102 — 44.7% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.06
24 1985 1488 104.3 — — — — -35 — +74 22.6% -2.29 0–3 (0%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +0.47 1991 1590 119.7 — — — — +56 +172 — 36.7% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–5 (0%) 93.8 +0.93
25 1986 1474 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.19 1992 1586 115.2 — — — — -5 +158 +152 45.2% -0.50 4–8 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 92.9 +1.34
26 1987 1542 110.3 — — — — -48 — +54 43.3% -0.72 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 104.8 +2.85 1993 1629 119.3 — — — — -57 +111 — 45.9% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 101.8 +0.90
27 1988 1504 112.8 — — — — -63 — +65 36.2% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 93.9 +0.36 1994 1586 107.2 — — — — -57 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 — — -0.20
28 1989 1468 103.4 — — — — +3 — +51 35.5% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +1.53 1995 1609 114.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.56
29 1990 1457 97.4 — — — — -10 — +67 26.3% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.40 1996 1555 105.6 — — — — -34 +118 +211 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 +0.42
30 1991 1503 120.4 — — — — -99 — +132 35.0% -1.40 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1473 105.8 — — — — -96 — +134 29.4% -1.47 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1576 110.5 — — — — -27 — +69 35.5% -1.20 19–30 (39%) 22–18 (55%) 102.5 +5.16 — 2083 145.9 — — — — -6 +45 -86 55.0% +0.38 95–63 (60%) 41–44 (48%) 102.1 -1.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.