H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Heather Ludloff vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 0-1
Laura Golarsa holds a 1–0 lead over Heather Ludloff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Golarsa leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Golarsa won the 1990 Birmingham second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1990* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Laura Golarsa | 6-3 6-3 | Heather Ludloff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heather Ludloff | #512 | #69 | 11 | 1,576 | 48 | 106 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Golarsa | #693 | #39 | 436 | 1,761 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heather Ludloff | Laura Golarsa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #79 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1982 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #58 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1983 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #61 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #213 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1985 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1987 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #219 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #168 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 |