H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Heather Ludloff vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 0-1

Nathalie Herreman holds a 1–0 lead over Heather Ludloff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1984 Pittsburgh round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Heather Ludloff
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #91 6-3 6-2 Heather Ludloff #71 Match data Jan 26, 1984* R32 Pittsburgh WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heather Ludloff #512 #69 11 1,575 48 106 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heather Ludloff Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1980 2–5 28.6% — 1,465 0 0 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,440 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1982 3–4 42.9% — 1,473 0 0 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1983 7–15 31.8% — 1,514 0 0 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1984 6–9 40.0% #129 1,545 0 0 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1985 2–12 14.3% #127 1,488 0 0 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1986 0–1 0.0% #192 1,473 0 0 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1987 12–16 42.9% #74 1,542 0 0 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1988 6–14 30.0% #123 1,504 0 0 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 1989 4–9 30.8% #164 1,468 0 0 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1990 2–6 25.0% #219 1,456 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
30 1991 3–5 37.5% #141 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1992 1–6 14.3% #282 1,472 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heather Ludloff Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1978 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1983 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1984 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1985 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1987 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1988 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 51 71 28.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 7 17 24 29.2% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heather Ludloff Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1978 1488 88.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.21 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1979 1483 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.05 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1980 1465 105.1 — — — — +53 — — 37.5% -0.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.22 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1981 1441 97.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.27 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1982 1473 106.3 — — — — +70 — — 46.7% -0.27 0–1 — — +0.83 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1983 1515 109.9 — — — — +14 — +43 34.7% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 +0.12 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1984 1546 102.7 — — — — -41 — +67 41.9% -1.26 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.91 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1985 1488 104.3 — — — — -35 — +74 22.6% -2.29 0–3 (0%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +0.47 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1986 1474 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.19 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1987 1542 110.3 — — — — -48 — +54 43.3% -0.72 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 104.8 +2.85 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1988 1504 112.8 — — — — -63 — +65 36.2% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 93.9 +0.36 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 1989 1468 103.4 — — — — +3 — +51 35.5% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +1.53 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 1990 1457 97.4 — — — — -10 — +67 26.3% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.40 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
30 1991 1503 120.4 — — — — -99 — +132 35.0% -1.40 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1473 105.8 — — — — -96 — +134 29.4% -1.47 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1576 110.5 — — — — -27 — +69 35.5% -1.20 19–30 (39%) 22–18 (55%) 102.5 +5.16 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.