H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Heather Ludloff vs Sophie Amiach H2H: 1-1
Heather Ludloff and Sophie Amiach are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Sophie Amiach won the 1989 Birmingham second round 5-7 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1989* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Sophie Amiach | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Heather Ludloff | Match data |
| Jun 13, 1984* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Heather Ludloff | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Sophie Amiach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heather Ludloff | #512 | #69 | 11 | 1,576 | 48 | 106 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sophie Amiach | #577 | #57 | 9 | 1,649 | 57 | 93 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heather Ludloff | Sophie Amiach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #173 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1985 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #129 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #243 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #219 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #199 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |