H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Heather Ludloff vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 1-0
Heather Ludloff holds a 1–0 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Heather Ludloff leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Heather Ludloff won the 1990 Wimbledon first round 2-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Heather Ludloff | 2-6 6-4 7-5 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heather Ludloff | #512 | #69 | 11 | 1,576 | 48 | 106 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heather Ludloff | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1983 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1987 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #219 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |