H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Heather Watson vs Kateryna Volodko H2H: 3-1

Heather Watson holds a 3–1 lead over Kateryna Volodko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Heather Watson leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Heather Watson won the 2020 Acapulco second round 7-6(2) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Heather Watson
Great Britain Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Kateryna Volodko
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Heather Watson #69 7-6(2) 6-2 Kateryna Volodko #494 Match data Feb 26, 2020 R16 Acapulco International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Heather Watson #125 6-4 7-6(3) Kateryna Volodko Match data Oct 10, 2019* R32 Tianjin International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Heather Watson #86 6-3 3-6 7-6(3) Kateryna Volodko #79 Match data May 24, 2018* R32 Nurnberg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Kateryna Volodko #62 6-3 0-6 6-1 Heather Watson #54 Match data May 18, 2016* R32 Strasbourg Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heather Watson #446 #38 1,386 1,755 146 199 42.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Kateryna Volodko #584 #29 1,740 1,802 138 190 42.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heather Watson Kateryna Volodko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #384 1,493 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #316 1,470 0 0
18 2010 1–5 16.7% #176 1,472 0 0 2005 7–7 50.0% #121 1,535 0 0
19 2011 10–11 47.6% #92 1,536 0 0 2006 5–10 33.3% #100 1,530 0 0
20 2012 18–17 51.4% #49 1,693 0 1 2007 13–19 40.6% #44 1,622 0 0
21 2013 9–16 36.0% #121 1,549 0 1 2008 15–19 44.1% #62 1,640 0 1
22 2014 9–17 34.6% #49 1,540 0 1 2009 23–20 53.5% #31 1,770 0 1
23 2015 18–19 48.6% #55 1,610 0 2 2010 8–15 34.8% #99 1,666 0 1
24 2016 16–19 45.7% #76 1,586 0 3 2011 14–10 58.3% #85 1,720 0 1
25 2017 13–15 46.4% #73 1,613 0 3 2012 7–12 36.8% #136 1,656 0 1
26 2018 10–17 37.0% #91 1,574 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2019 5–9 35.7% #103 1,624 0 3 2014 0–2 0.0% #201 1,616 0 1
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #58 1,663 0 4 2015 8–14 36.4% #89 1,605 0 1
29 2021 7–17 29.2% #72 1,577 0 4 2016 14–17 45.2% #69 1,673 0 1
30 2022 9–12 42.9% #139 1,568 0 4 2017 13–14 48.1% #92 1,652 0 2
31 2023 8–7 53.3% #137 1,595 0 4 2018 4–12 25.0% #132 1,587 0 2
32 2024 3–6 33.3% #162 1,569 0 4 2019 0–2 0.0% #1168 1,554 0 2
33 2025 1–3 25.0% #269 1,544 0 4 2020 5–8 38.5% #285 1,519 0 2
34 2026 0–1 0.0% #446 1,595 0 4 2021 1–2 33.3% #207 1,534 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2023 0–2 0.0% #276 1,553 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% #584 1,543 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heather Watson Kateryna Volodko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2005 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2011 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2012 10 11 21 47.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2013 7 12 19 36.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 4 12 16 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2014 4 13 17 23.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 2015 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 7 12 19 36.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2016 13 11 24 54.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2011 7 6 13 53.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2017 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2018 7 9 16 43.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2021 3 12 15 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2016 8 11 19 42.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2022 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2017 9 9 18 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2023 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2018 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2024 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 94 122 216 43.5% 11 27 38 28.9% 41 50 91 45.1% — — — — — 84 117 201 41.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 17 19 36 47.2% 2 1 3 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 324/345 of Heather Watson's and 282/323 of Kateryna Volodko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Heather Watson Kateryna Volodko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2010 6/6 2.7 3.2 62.5% 58.2% 41.9% 44.7% 30.6% 52.2% 40.1% 2005 4/14 4.3 4.8 51.4% 66.4% 43.7% 52.6% 32.1% 55.4% 39.6%
19 2011 21/21 3.2 2.8 65.7% 63.2% 45.6% 56.1% 47.7% 57.3% 44.0% 2006 8/15 3.0 6.1 54.5% 61.2% 47.5% 44.5% 48.0% 54.8% 42.2%
20 2012 30/35 2.8 2.9 65.0% 63.4% 43.8% 48.6% 46.6% 56.4% 42.9% 2007 27/32 2.7 4.6 57.4% 63.9% 44.4% 57.8% 50.6% 55.6% 43.3%
21 2013 25/25 3.6 3.1 62.5% 63.2% 47.0% 52.4% 47.4% 57.0% 40.8% 2008 33/34 2.4 3.7 57.4% 64.2% 46.1% 49.9% 47.7% 56.6% 40.0%
22 2014 24/26 2.9 3.4 59.3% 60.0% 42.1% 43.9% 51.4% 52.0% 40.8% 2009 41/43 2.0 3.5 63.5% 62.3% 44.6% 49.5% 49.1% 55.7% 43.8%
23 2015 31/37 3.5 3.5 58.9% 64.6% 48.5% 54.7% 52.9% 58.0% 42.4% 2010 21/23 2.7 4.4 60.6% 59.9% 41.6% 45.5% 43.5% 52.7% 43.1%
24 2016 33/35 4.2 3.8 58.5% 65.2% 46.2% 57.8% 51.6% 57.3% 45.0% 2011 23/24 1.5 3.8 64.8% 62.4% 43.3% 53.4% 60.9% 56.0% 46.7%
25 2017 27/28 3.5 4.9 58.6% 66.8% 45.4% 61.4% 49.9% 57.8% 43.0% 2012 17/19 1.7 6.8 64.1% 61.2% 35.3% 50.6% 44.1% 51.9% 42.7%
26 2018 26/27 4.1 3.4 59.5% 64.9% 43.9% 49.2% 45.6% 56.4% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 14/14 3.4 3.4 57.0% 63.2% 43.4% 56.7% 37.8% 54.7% 40.9% 2014 2/2 0.5 6.0 63.1% 68.8% 28.9% 54.5% 49.2% 53.9% 42.4%
28 2020 17/17 4.1 3.2 57.0% 64.4% 43.9% 52.1% 53.4% 55.8% 42.0% 2015 14/22 1.5 5.3 69.1% 62.2% 47.4% 59.2% 56.9% 57.6% 39.7%
29 2021 23/24 5.4 4.1 56.3% 67.6% 41.7% 58.4% 46.4% 56.4% 37.2% 2016 31/31 2.5 4.5 64.8% 62.1% 43.6% 51.6% 52.0% 55.3% 44.4%
30 2022 20/21 2.9 2.1 62.3% 63.2% 44.4% 52.4% 51.3% 56.1% 40.4% 2017 26/27 2.5 5.1 62.8% 62.7% 43.7% 47.0% 57.8% 55.6% 45.0%
31 2023 15/15 3.2 3.5 59.7% 65.9% 42.0% 44.9% 38.1% 56.2% 42.5% 2018 14/16 2.1 5.7 60.0% 60.4% 41.8% 50.4% 40.5% 53.0% 39.3%
32 2024 9/9 2.2 3.4 55.4% 67.6% 44.0% 50.8% 52.4% 56.8% 39.0% 2019 2/2 2.5 7.5 48.6% 58.1% 32.0% 37.5% 34.1% 44.6% 41.0%
33 2025 2/4 2.5 2.5 51.4% 65.4% 41.1% 35.0% 39.6% 53.7% 43.4% 2020 13/13 2.1 6.0 59.6% 64.5% 40.3% 55.8% 53.2% 54.5% 41.4%
34 2026 1/1 0.0 4.0 48.5% 68.8% 23.5% 57.1% 33.3% 45.5% 37.9% 2021 3/3 2.0 3.3 58.4% 51.7% 41.3% 47.5% 33.2% 47.4% 37.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 2/2 0.0 5.0 61.7% 54.7% 35.4% 54.2% 69.0% 47.4% 38.7%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 1/1 1.0 5.0 60.3% 70.5% 65.5% 60.0% 25.0% 68.5% 31.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heather Watson Kateryna Volodko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1493 99.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — +0.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1470 92.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — 0–1 — -0.06
18 2010 1473 98.6 -0.96 -1.56 0.838 46.2% — — +99 23.1% -1.38 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 2005 1535 114.5 -0.65 -1.39 0.888 47.3% +53 -74 — 48.4% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.2 +0.22
19 2011 1537 115.9 +1.02 -0.72 1.031 51.0% +26 -23 +9 51.1% +0.30 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 96.5 +1.09 2006 1530 109.9 -0.47 -1.41 0.933 48.7% +34 -81 — 39.4% -0.76 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.19
20 2012 1693 127.7 +0.47 +0.10 0.984 49.6% -34 -139 -55 51.3% -0.23 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 103.8 -0.84 2007 1623 134.3 -0.20 +0.29 0.974 49.7% -9 -92 — 40.5% -0.53 6–6 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 102.9 -1.23
21 2013 1550 109.0 +0.35 -2.61 0.948 49.1% -5 — +30 38.3% -0.70 5–9 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 94.6 +0.15 2008 1641 129.4 +1.11 -2.53 0.922 48.7% -55 -111 +64 44.9% -0.41 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.4 -0.94
22 2014 1540 121.1 -2.65 -1.65 0.851 46.8% -40 — +96 36.1% -0.87 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.39 2009 1771 139.2 +0.57 +0.61 0.989 49.9% -80 -106 -46 53.5% +0.09 8–7 (53%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -0.90
23 2015 1610 129.5 -0.01 +1.12 1.008 50.4% -15 -87 +77 50.6% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 2–7 (22%) 96.0 -0.01 2010 1667 123.1 -2.00 -0.23 0.911 47.7% -7 -36 — 37.5% -0.85 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 -0.17
24 2016 1586 126.9 +0.96 +0.88 1.053 51.0% +27 -56 +28 48.2% +0.12 8–9 (47%) 4–4 (50%) 99.3 -0.97 2011 1721 131.2 +0.20 +2.11 1.061 51.5% -32 -47 -19 62.0% +0.92 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -1.37
25 2017 1614 124.1 +1.17 -0.04 1.019 50.6% -57 — +98 49.2% +0.29 5–6 (45%) 2–7 (22%) 95.1 -1.23 2012 1656 118.5 -1.96 -0.33 0.888 47.3% +28 -33 +55 36.4% -0.91 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 101.9 -1.12
26 2018 1574 120.5 -0.38 -0.79 0.981 49.7% +4 -55 +92 41.9% -0.42 2–6 (25%) 2–5 (29%) 93.2 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1625 117.3 -0.69 -1.28 0.902 47.8% 0 — -17 38.7% -0.68 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.8 -0.18 2014 1617 101.3 -2.50 -3.04 0.919 47.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — — +0.07
28 2020 1664 126.5 -0.35 +0.15 0.950 49.1% +30 — — 51.2% -0.10 6–3 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 101.7 -0.02 2015 1605 129.5 -0.14 -0.79 0.935 49.1% +30 -35 — 40.8% -0.22 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) 94.1 -1.36
29 2021 1578 117.2 -0.31 -3.41 0.854 47.3% +6 — +45 33.3% -0.80 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) 99.6 +0.11 2016 1673 127.0 -0.24 +0.59 0.993 49.8% +20 -110 +22 44.9% -0.05 9–7 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 98.5 -1.35
30 2022 1568 107.0 -0.88 -1.99 0.920 48.4% +3 -155 +83 39.6% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 3–7 (30%) 101.5 +1.46 2017 1653 121.1 -0.88 +1.50 1.012 50.3% +65 -155 — 48.3% -0.15 3–7 (30%) 2–4 (33%) 95.5 +1.05
31 2023 1596 115.3 -0.40 -1.06 0.971 49.4% -14 — +129 50.0% -0.09 3–1 (75%) 4–0 (100%) 105.8 +0.33 2018 1587 117.1 -1.92 -1.90 0.835 46.5% +93 -154 +97 34.2% -0.89 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 100.9 -0.30
32 2024 1569 118.9 -0.40 -1.74 0.904 47.8% +24 — +120 35.0% -0.65 1–1 0–1 — +0.23 2019 1555 96.1 -2.89 -0.91 0.739 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.17
33 2025 1544 104.7 -1.18 +1.77 0.937 48.3% — — +113 33.3% -0.55 0–1 0–1 — -0.02 2020 1520 114.3 -2.12 -1.71 0.910 48.5% +80 — — 38.7% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.76
34 2026 1595 109.3 -0.18 -2.54 0.695 41.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 2021 1535 102.9 -0.85 -0.91 0.710 42.6% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 — — +0.05
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1550 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1553 107.2 -1.05 +0.97 0.736 44.2% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.28
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1543 102.6 -0.34 -0.32 1.010 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.29
Career — 1755 124.6 -0.08 -0.77 0.959 49.3% -6 -84 +58 44.2% -0.28 57–70 (45%) 43–60 (42%) 92.9 +0.18 — 1802 130.3 -0.44 -0.15 0.950 49.0% +5 -92 +35 44.0% -0.33 52–60 (46%) 33–52 (39%) 94.5 -1.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.