H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Heather Watson vs Sílvia Soler-Espinosa H2H: 1-0
Heather Watson holds a 1–0 lead over Sílvia Soler-Espinosa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Heather Watson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Heather Watson won the 2012 London Olympics second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2012* | London Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Grass | Heather Watson | 6-2 6-2 | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heather Watson | #475 | #38 | 1,386 | 1,755 | 146 | 198 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | #858 | #54 | 1,157 | 1,643 | 56 | 103 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heather Watson | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #92 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #121 | 1,549 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #49 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #73 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #91 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #66 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #145 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #128 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #72 | 1,577 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #190 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #137 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #681 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #269 | 1,545 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #475 | 1,612 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |