H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Heather Watson vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1

Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Heather Watson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2011 Quebec City quarterfinal 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Heather Watson
Great Britain Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamira Paszek 6-4 7-6(5) Heather Watson #107 Match data Sep 17, 2011* QF Quebec City International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heather Watson #387 #38 1,386 1,755 146 199 42.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heather Watson Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 2010 1–5 16.7% #176 1,472 0 0 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2011 10–11 47.6% #92 1,536 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2012 18–17 51.4% #49 1,693 0 1 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2013 9–16 36.0% #121 1,549 0 1 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2014 9–17 34.6% #49 1,540 0 1 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 2015 18–19 48.6% #55 1,610 0 2 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2016 16–19 45.7% #76 1,586 0 3 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2017 13–15 46.4% #73 1,613 0 3 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2018 10–17 37.0% #91 1,574 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2019 5–9 35.7% #103 1,624 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #58 1,663 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2021 7–17 29.2% #72 1,577 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 2022 9–12 42.9% #139 1,568 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 2023 8–7 53.3% #137 1,595 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2024 3–6 33.3% #162 1,569 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2025 1–3 25.0% #269 1,544 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2026 0–1 0.0% #387 1,595 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heather Watson Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2011 7 6 13 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2012 10 11 21 47.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2013 7 12 19 36.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2014 4 13 17 23.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2015 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2016 13 11 24 54.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2017 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2018 7 9 16 43.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 3 12 15 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 94 122 216 43.5% 11 27 38 28.9% 41 50 91 45.1% — — — — — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 324/345 of Heather Watson's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Heather Watson Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 2010 6/6 2.7 3.2 62.5% 58.2% 41.9% 44.7% 30.6% 52.2% 40.1% 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2011 21/21 3.2 2.8 65.7% 63.2% 45.6% 56.1% 47.7% 57.3% 44.0% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2012 30/35 2.8 2.9 65.0% 63.4% 43.8% 48.6% 46.6% 56.4% 42.9% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2013 25/25 3.6 3.1 62.5% 63.2% 47.0% 52.4% 47.4% 57.0% 40.8% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2014 24/26 2.9 3.4 59.3% 60.0% 42.1% 43.9% 51.4% 52.0% 40.8% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 2015 31/37 3.5 3.5 58.9% 64.6% 48.5% 54.7% 52.9% 58.0% 42.4% 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2016 33/35 4.2 3.8 58.5% 65.2% 46.2% 57.8% 51.6% 57.3% 45.0% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2017 27/28 3.5 4.9 58.6% 66.8% 45.4% 61.4% 49.9% 57.8% 43.0% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2018 26/27 4.1 3.4 59.5% 64.9% 43.9% 49.2% 45.6% 56.4% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 14/14 3.4 3.4 57.0% 63.2% 43.4% 56.7% 37.8% 54.7% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 17/17 4.1 3.2 57.0% 64.4% 43.9% 52.1% 53.4% 55.8% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 23/24 5.4 4.1 56.3% 67.6% 41.7% 58.4% 46.4% 56.4% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 20/21 2.9 2.1 62.3% 63.2% 44.4% 52.4% 51.3% 56.1% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 15/15 3.2 3.5 59.7% 65.9% 42.0% 44.9% 38.1% 56.2% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 9/9 2.2 3.4 55.4% 67.6% 44.0% 50.8% 52.4% 56.8% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 2/4 2.5 2.5 51.4% 65.4% 41.1% 35.0% 39.6% 53.7% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 1/1 0.0 4.0 48.5% 68.8% 23.5% 57.1% 33.3% 45.5% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 324/345 3.5 3.4 60.0% 64.3% 44.6% 52.9% 48.0% 56.3% 41.9% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heather Watson Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 2010 1473 98.6 -0.96 -1.56 0.838 46.2% — — +99 23.1% -1.38 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 2011 1537 115.9 +1.02 -0.72 1.031 51.0% +26 -23 +9 51.1% +0.30 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 96.5 +1.09 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2012 1693 127.7 +0.47 +0.10 0.984 49.6% -34 -139 -55 51.3% -0.23 5–5 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 103.8 -0.84 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2013 1550 109.0 +0.35 -2.61 0.948 49.1% -5 — +30 38.3% -0.70 5–9 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 94.6 +0.15 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2014 1540 121.1 -2.65 -1.65 0.851 46.8% -40 — +96 36.1% -0.87 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.39 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 2015 1610 129.5 -0.01 +1.12 1.008 50.4% -15 -87 +77 50.6% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 2–7 (22%) 96.0 -0.01 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2016 1586 126.9 +0.96 +0.88 1.053 51.0% +27 -56 +28 48.2% +0.12 8–9 (47%) 4–4 (50%) 99.3 -0.97 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2017 1614 124.1 +1.17 -0.04 1.019 50.6% -57 — +98 49.2% +0.29 5–6 (45%) 2–7 (22%) 95.1 -1.23 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2018 1574 120.5 -0.38 -0.79 0.981 49.7% +4 -55 +92 41.9% -0.42 2–6 (25%) 2–5 (29%) 93.2 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1625 117.3 -0.69 -1.28 0.902 47.8% 0 — -17 38.7% -0.68 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.8 -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 1664 126.5 -0.35 +0.15 0.950 49.1% +30 — — 51.2% -0.10 6–3 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 101.7 -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 1578 117.2 -0.31 -3.41 0.854 47.3% +6 — +45 33.3% -0.80 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) 99.6 +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1568 107.0 -0.88 -1.99 0.920 48.4% +3 -155 +83 39.6% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 3–7 (30%) 101.5 +1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1596 115.3 -0.40 -1.06 0.971 49.4% -14 — +129 50.0% -0.09 3–1 (75%) 4–0 (100%) 105.8 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 1569 118.9 -0.40 -1.74 0.904 47.8% +24 — +120 35.0% -0.65 1–1 0–1 — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 1544 104.7 -1.18 +1.77 0.937 48.3% — — +113 33.3% -0.55 0–1 0–1 — -0.03 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 1595 109.3 -0.38 -2.59 0.695 41.9% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1755 124.6 -0.08 -0.77 0.959 49.3% -6 -84 +58 44.2% -0.28 57–70 (45%) 43–60 (42%) 92.9 +0.17 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.