H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Heather Watson vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-2

Venus Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Heather Watson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2018 San Jose fourth round 6-4 4-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Heather Watson
GBR Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 3, 2018* San Jose WTA 500 R16 Hard Venus Williams #14 6-4 4-6 6-0 Heather Watson #133 Match data
Oct 1, 2014* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #19 6-3 6-1 Heather Watson #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Heather Watson #470 #38 1,386 1,755 144 195 42.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heather Watson Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2010 1–5 16.7% #176 1,472 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2011 10–11 47.6% #92 1,537 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2012 17–16 51.5% #49 1,690 0 1 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2013 9–16 36.0% #121 1,550 0 1 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2014 9–17 34.6% #49 1,555 0 1 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2015 18–19 48.6% #55 1,614 0 2 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2016 15–18 45.5% #76 1,584 0 3 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2017 13–14 48.1% #73 1,626 0 3 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2018 10–16 38.5% #91 1,584 0 3 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2019 5–10 33.3% #103 1,622 0 3 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #58 1,663 0 4 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2021 7–16 30.4% #72 1,590 0 4 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2022 9–12 42.9% #139 1,569 0 4 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2023 8–7 53.3% #137 1,598 0 4 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2024 3–6 33.3% #162 1,570 0 4 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2025 1–3 25.0% #269 1,545 0 4 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2026 0–1 0.0% #470 1,592 0 4 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47