H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Heather Watson vs Vera Zvonareva H2H: 0-1
Vera Zvonareva holds a 1–0 lead over Heather Watson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vera Zvonareva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Vera Zvonareva won the 2011 Eastbourne third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 34
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2011* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Vera Zvonareva | 6-3 6-3 | Heather Watson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heather Watson | #470 | #38 | 1,386 | 1,755 | 144 | 195 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Vera Zvonareva | #307 | #2 | 7,935 | 2,077 | 459 | 268 | 63.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heather Watson | Vera Zvonareva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #45 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #13 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #92 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 54–27 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,935 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2012 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #49 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #121 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #24 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2014 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #49 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,935 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2015 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #55 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #76 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #73 | 1,626 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #2 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2018 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #91 | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 54–22 | 71.1% | #7 | 1,946 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2019 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #58 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #72 | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,743 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2022 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #185 | 1,671 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #137 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #200 | 1,676 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #269 | 1,545 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,702 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,592 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #159 | 1,680 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,731 | 0 | 12 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,753 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #357 | 1,711 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,683 | 0 | 12 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,646 | 0 | 12 |