H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Heidi Eisterlehner vs Betty Stove H2H: 1-2
Betty Stove holds a 2–1 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Betty Stove leads 2–0 on carpet, while Heidi Eisterlehner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Heidi Eisterlehner won the 1980 Hilton Head second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 81
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1980* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Heidi Eisterlehner | 6-1 6-2 | Betty Stove | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1978* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Betty Stove | 6-3 6-3 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1975* | Paris | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Betty Stove | 6-4 6-1 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Betty Stove | — | — | — | 2,165 | 413 | 304 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heidi Eisterlehner | Betty Stove | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 48–28 | 63.2% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 1,959 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 37–27 | 57.8% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 24–20 | 54.5% | — | 1,954 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,953 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 37–20 | 64.9% | — | 2,076 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 2,069 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 51–24 | 68.0% | — | 2,090 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 24–23 | 51.1% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 5–20 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 7 |