H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Heidi Eisterlehner vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 1-2
Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 2–1 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1981 Neumunster Indoors semifinal 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 1981* | Neumunster Indoors | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
| Sep 10, 1980 | Wiesbaden | WTA 250 | RR | Clay | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1980* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Heidi Eisterlehner | 6-3 7-6 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heidi Eisterlehner | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |