H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Heidi Eisterlehner holds a 1–0 lead over Elsa Rodriguez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Heidi Eisterlehner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Heidi Eisterlehner won the 1982 Brasilia round of 32 6-2 6-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | 6-2 6-7 6-2 | Elsa Rodriguez | Match data | Mar 18, 1982* | R32 | Brasilia | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,773 | 114 | 128 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Elsa Rodriguez | — | — | — | 1,522 | 3 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Heidi Eisterlehner | Elsa Rodriguez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,438 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Heidi Eisterlehner | Elsa Rodriguez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1969 | 1486 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 | 1977 | 1492 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.20 |
| 1970 | 1508 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | 50.0% | -0.92 | — | — | — | +0.52 | 1982 | 1479 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | 38.9% | -0.61 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.82 |
| 1972 | 1439 | 91.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | 9.1% | -3.27 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 1466 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | 44.0% | -0.56 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | +1.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 1483 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | 40.0% | -1.40 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 1667 | 123.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +28 | -100 | 56.6% | +0.36 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.4 | +0.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 1653 | 123.0 | — | — | — | — | -39 | +22 | -102 | 47.4% | -0.24 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–1 (80%) | 105.0 | +0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 1612 | 114.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +52 | -149 | 38.6% | -0.90 | 5–3 (63%) | 4–4 (50%) | 102.1 | +0.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 1608 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | +85 | +48 | -126 | 50.8% | -0.09 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.5 | +3.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 1596 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | +100 | — | — | 36.4% | -1.36 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–3 (40%) | 98.1 | +1.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 1709 | 134.1 | — | — | — | — | +20 | +64 | — | 63.5% | +0.94 | 5–7 (42%) | 4–2 (67%) | 99.8 | +1.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 1638 | 110.6 | — | — | — | — | +76 | +55 | — | 42.2% | -0.47 | 2–5 (29%) | 0–2 | — | +2.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 1548 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | +106 | +36 | — | 45.5% | -0.45 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.4 | +2.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 1553 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 1536 | 106.8 | — | — | — | — | +87 | — | — | 35.7% | -1.29 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1773 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | +58 | +42 | -116 | 48.2% | -0.26 | 38–41 (48%) | 23–21 (52%) | 99.9 | +7.72 | Career | 1522 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | 35.0% | -1.00 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +6.89 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jul 16, 1981 | H2H |
| Helga Masthoff | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jul 30, 1980 | H2H |
| Sue Barker | 1 | 5 | 6 | May 31, 1979 | H2H |
| Regina Marsikova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 26, 1980 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 1 | 4 | 5 | Nov 17, 1977 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helen Park | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 29, 1982 | H2H |
| Maria Victoria Baldovinos Cibeira | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 8, 1982 | H2H |
| Andrea Tiezzi | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 2, 1982 | H2H |
| Kathy Keating | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 1, 1982 | H2H |
| Kate Glancy | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 27, 1982 | H2H |