H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Heidi Eisterlehner vs Eva Pfaff H2H: 2-0
Heidi Eisterlehner holds a 2–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Heidi Eisterlehner leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Heidi Eisterlehner won the 1980 Wiesbaden round-robin match 6-2 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 1980 | Wiesbaden | WTA 250 | RR | Clay | Heidi Eisterlehner | 6-2 6-7 6-4 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Jul 24, 1980* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Heidi Eisterlehner | 6-1 6-3 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heidi Eisterlehner | Eva Pfaff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |