H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Heidi Eisterlehner vs Fiorella Bonicelli H2H: 0-2
Fiorella Bonicelli holds a 2–0 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fiorella Bonicelli leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Fiorella Bonicelli won the 1977 Toronto third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 74
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1977 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Fiorella Bonicelli | 6-0 6-3 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
| Jul 27, 1975* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Fiorella Bonicelli | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Fiorella Bonicelli | — | — | — | 1,866 | 135 | 97 | 58.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heidi Eisterlehner | Fiorella Bonicelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 12–10 | 54.5% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 11 |
| 22 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 12 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,763 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |