H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Heidi Eisterlehner vs Katja Ebbinghaus H2H: 1-2
Katja Ebbinghaus holds a 2–1 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Katja Ebbinghaus leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Heidi Eisterlehner won the 1980 Reutlingen semifinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Age 78
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1980* | Reutlingen | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Heidi Eisterlehner | 6-2 6-3 | Katja Ebbinghaus | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1977* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Katja Ebbinghaus | 6-1 6-2 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1970* | Braunschweig | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Katja Ebbinghaus | 8-6 6-3 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Katja Ebbinghaus | — | — | — | 1,873 | 173 | 143 | 54.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heidi Eisterlehner | Katja Ebbinghaus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 14–13 | 51.9% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 19–14 | 57.6% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 6 |