H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Heidi Eisterlehner vs Kora Schediwy H2H: 2-2
Heidi Eisterlehner and Kora Schediwy are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kora Schediwy leads 2–1 on clay, while Heidi Eisterlehner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Heidi Eisterlehner won the 1978 Bremen quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 1978* | Bremen | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Heidi Eisterlehner | 6-4 6-1 | Kora Schediwy | Match data |
| Jun 3, 1974* | Berlin | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Kora Schediwy | 6-2 6-2 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
| May 10, 1974* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Heidi Eisterlehner | 1-6 6-3 7-6 | Kora Schediwy | Match data |
| Jul 7, 1973* | Travemunde | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Kora Schediwy | 6-1 6-1 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kora Schediwy | — | — | — | 1,704 | 70 | 76 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Heidi Eisterlehner | Kora Schediwy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 8–7 | 53.3% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 10–7 | 58.8% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 2 |
| 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |