H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Heidi Eisterlehner vs Laura Arraya H2H: 0-1
Laura Arraya holds a 1–0 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1982 Sao Paulo round-robin match 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1982 | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | RR | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-3 7-6 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heidi Eisterlehner | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |