H2H data updated: 2026-10-25 00:00 UTC

Heidi Eisterlehner vs Lele Forood H2H: 0-1

Lele Forood holds a 1–0 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lele Forood leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lele Forood won the 1981 Gstaad round of 16 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Heidi Eisterlehner
GER Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lele Forood
USA Age 70

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lele Forood 6-2 7-5 Heidi Eisterlehner Match data Jul 10, 1981* R16 Gstaad WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heidi Eisterlehner — — — 1,769 114 130 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lele Forood — — — 1,682 55 97 36.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Lele Forood
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1974 3–1 75.0% — 1,514 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1975 4–0 100.0% — 1,573 0 1
19 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,575 0 1
20 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,507 0 0 1977 4–11 26.7% — 1,553 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1978 4–9 30.8% — 1,613 0 1
22 1972 0–5 0.0% — 1,438 0 0 1979 9–19 32.1% — 1,637 0 1
23 1973 5–6 45.5% — 1,466 0 0 1980 12–16 42.9% — 1,637 0 1
24 1974 2–2 50.0% — 1,482 0 0 1981 4–10 28.6% — 1,593 0 1
25 1975 13–9 59.1% — 1,666 0 2 1982 5–9 35.7% — 1,567 0 1
26 1976 15–19 44.1% — 1,653 0 2 1983 8–16 33.3% — 1,554 0 1
27 1977 11–15 42.3% — 1,612 0 2 1984 1–3 25.0% — 1,525 0 1
28 1978 14–16 46.7% — 1,605 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1979 4–6 40.0% — 1,594 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1980 27–18 60.0% — 1,706 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1981 7–12 36.8% — 1,636 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 1982 10–12 45.5% — 1,548 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1983 1–2 33.3% — 1,552 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1984 2–4 33.3% — 1,536 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Lele Forood
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1969 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1970 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
22 1972 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1973 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1974 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1975 — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1976 3 1 4 75.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1981 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 8 10 18 44.4% 72 73 145 49.7% 9 25 34 26.5% 23 19 42 54.8% — 12 27 39 30.8% 20 33 53 37.7% 16 21 37 43.2% 4 14 18 22.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Lele Forood
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1481 92.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.26
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1477 101.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1514 108.8 — — — — — — +84 70.0% +2.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.81
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1574 116.6 — — — — — +19 — 88.9% +3.67 1–0 — — +1.14
19 1969 1486 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.13 1976 1575 102.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.67 1–1 1–0 — +0.32
20 1970 1508 100.6 — — — — — +43 — 50.0% -0.92 — — — +0.52 1977 1553 117.3 — — — — +73 -21 — 32.4% -1.12 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.53
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1614 126.7 — — — — +34 — -23 37.5% -1.25 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -1.91
22 1972 1439 91.1 — — — — — +19 — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.82 1979 1638 136.4 — — — — -17 -51 -18 36.5% -0.71 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 -1.32
23 1973 1466 102.3 — — — — — +30 — 44.0% -0.56 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.68 1980 1638 120.3 — — — — -89 -71 +26 43.8% -0.64 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.9 -1.01
24 1974 1483 100.4 — — — — — +33 — 40.0% -1.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.79 1981 1593 118.2 — — — — -35 +1 +56 31.0% -0.76 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.28
25 1975 1667 123.4 — — — — — +28 -100 56.6% +0.36 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 +0.81 1982 1568 115.7 — — — — -58 -16 — 35.5% -1.23 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.8 +0.53
26 1976 1653 123.0 — — — — -39 +22 -101 47.4% -0.24 6–6 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 105.0 +0.87 1983 1554 109.7 — — — — -26 -11 +102 33.3% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 99.8 +0.61
27 1977 1612 114.1 — — — — — +52 -147 38.6% -0.90 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 102.1 +0.82 1984 1526 92.2 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.56
28 1978 1605 119.3 — — — — +79 +51 -122 49.3% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 +2.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1979 1594 107.1 — — — — +95 — — 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.2 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1980 1707 133.4 — — — — +7 +67 — 62.6% +0.85 5–8 (38%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 +1.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1981 1637 110.6 — — — — +67 +56 — 42.2% -0.47 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +2.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1982 1548 102.2 — — — — +97 +36 — 45.5% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 +2.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1983 1553 103.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–1 — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1984 1536 106.9 — — — — +81 — — 35.7% -1.29 1–1 — — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1769 120.8 — — — — +49 +43 -114 47.9% -0.29 38–42 (48%) 23–21 (52%) 99.5 +7.49 — 1683 126.6 — — — — -21 -26 +45 38.5% -0.81 23–22 (51%) 10–19 (34%) 97.3 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.