H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Heidi Eisterlehner vs Liz Smylie H2H: 1-0
Heidi Eisterlehner holds a 1–0 lead over Liz Smylie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Heidi Eisterlehner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Heidi Eisterlehner won the 1982 Tokyo Japan Open third round 4-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 1982* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Heidi Eisterlehner | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heidi Eisterlehner | Liz Smylie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |