H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Heidi Eisterlehner vs Marise Kruger H2H: 3-1
Heidi Eisterlehner holds a 3–1 lead over Marise Kruger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Heidi Eisterlehner leads 2–0 on clay, while Marise Kruger leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Heidi Eisterlehner won the 1977 Hamburg fourth round 6-7 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 68
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1977* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Heidi Eisterlehner | 6-7 6-3 6-4 | Marise Kruger | Match data |
| Nov 26, 1976* | Johannesburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Heidi Eisterlehner | 6-3 6-7 6-4 | Marise Kruger | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1976* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Heidi Eisterlehner | 6-1 4-6 6-1 | Marise Kruger | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1976* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Marise Kruger | 6-3 6-4 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Marise Kruger | — | — | — | 1,890 | 71 | 70 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heidi Eisterlehner | Marise Kruger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 18–9 | 66.7% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,763 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |