H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Heidi Eisterlehner vs Michelle Tyler H2H: 1-1
Heidi Eisterlehner and Michelle Tyler are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Michelle Tyler leads 1–0 on clay, while Heidi Eisterlehner leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michelle Tyler won the 1978 Rome fourth round 2-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 68
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1978* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Michelle Tyler | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1976* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Heidi Eisterlehner | 6-4 6-2 | Michelle Tyler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Michelle Tyler | — | — | — | 1,893 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heidi Eisterlehner | Michelle Tyler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |