H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Heidi Eisterlehner vs Naoko Sato H2H: 2-0
Heidi Eisterlehner holds a 2–0 lead over Naoko Sato in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Heidi Eisterlehner leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Heidi Eisterlehner won the 1980 Nagoya fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1980* | Nagoya | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Heidi Eisterlehner | 6-1 6-2 | Naoko Sato | Match data |
| Dec 25, 1978 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Heidi Eisterlehner | 6-2 6-4 | Naoko Sato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Naoko Sato | — | — | — | 1,637 | 58 | 91 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heidi Eisterlehner | Naoko Sato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |