H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Heidi Eisterlehner vs Sophie Amiach H2H: 0-1
Sophie Amiach holds a 1–0 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sophie Amiach leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sophie Amiach won the 1982 Sao Paulo round-robin match 6-2 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1982 | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | RR | Clay | Sophie Amiach | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Sophie Amiach | #577 | #57 | 9 | 1,649 | 57 | 93 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heidi Eisterlehner | Sophie Amiach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 10–5 | 66.7% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #173 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #129 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #243 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #199 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #446 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |