H2H data updated: 2026-10-25 00:00 UTC

Heidi Eisterlehner vs Tracy Austin H2H: 0-2

Tracy Austin holds a 2–0 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tracy Austin won the 1980 Charleston Open round of 16 6-1 6-0.

GER Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tracy Austin 6-1 6-0 Heidi Eisterlehner Match data Apr 11, 1980* R16 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Tracy Austin 3-6 6-3 6-1 Heidi Eisterlehner Match data Sep 2, 1977* R128 US Open Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heidi Eisterlehner — — — 1,769 114 130 46.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tracy Austin #81 #1 19 2,522 341 88 79.5% 2 0 1 12 15 30

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Tracy Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,780 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1978 44–13 77.2% #6 2,087 0 3
16 — — — — — — — 1979 73–12 85.9% #3 2,436 1 10
17 — — — — — — — 1980 82–10 89.1% #2 2,463 1 21
18 — — — — — — — 1981 56–7 88.9% #2 2,449 2 29
19 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0 1982 35–12 74.5% #4 2,267 2 30
20 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,507 0 0 1983 24–8 75.0% #9 2,189 2 30
21 — — — — — — — 1984 2–2 50.0% #27 2,139 2 30
22 1972 0–5 0.0% — 1,438 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1973 5–6 45.5% — 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1974 2–2 50.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1975 13–9 59.1% — 1,666 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 1976 15–19 44.1% — 1,653 0 2 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,081 2 30
27 1977 11–15 42.3% — 1,612 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 1978 14–16 46.7% — 1,605 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1979 4–6 40.0% — 1,594 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1980 27–18 60.0% — 1,706 0 3 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,972 2 30
31 1981 7–12 36.8% — 1,636 0 3 1994 5–8 38.5% #81 1,852 2 30
32 1982 10–12 45.5% — 1,548 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 1983 1–2 33.3% — 1,552 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1984 2–4 33.3% — 1,536 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Tracy Austin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 16 5 21 76.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 13 3 16 81.3%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 22 4 26 84.6% 10 0 10 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 33 6 39 84.6%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 8 1 9 88.9% 11 1 12 91.7% 44 4 48 91.7%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 12 2 14 85.7% 20 4 24 83.3%
19 1969 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 11 2 13 84.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1970 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — 8 2 10 80.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 12 5 17 70.6%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1972 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1973 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1974 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1975 — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1976 3 1 4 75.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1993 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1981 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 8 10 18 44.4% 72 73 145 49.7% 9 25 34 26.5% 23 19 42 54.8% — 102 26 128 79.7% 44 13 57 77.2% 49 14 63 77.8% 141 34 175 80.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Tracy Austin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1781 150.1 — — — — -85 -31 — 59.1% +0.55 2–0 1–0 — -1.01
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2087 165.9 — — — — -15 -282 -367 73.1% +2.01 6–3 (67%) 7–2 (78%) 108.9 -2.13
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2436 178.9 — — — — +5 -373 -551 80.9% +2.33 13–3 (81%) 6–3 (67%) 110.9 -8.70
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2464 180.2 — — — — +151 -327 -415 85.5% +3.11 12–3 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -4.53
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2450 175.9 — — — — +119 -339 -340 84.6% +2.88 7–3 (70%) 7–4 (64%) 101.5 -3.61
19 1969 1486 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.13 1982 2267 167.2 — — — — +185 -147 -207 75.5% +2.05 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 94.0 -1.41
20 1970 1508 100.6 — — — — — +43 — 50.0% -0.92 — — — +0.52 1983 2189 159.8 — — — — +140 -59 -83 76.5% +1.88 2–4 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 94.9 -1.86
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2140 115.0 — — — — +111 — — 50.0% +0.13 — — — +0.03
22 1972 1439 91.1 — — — — — +19 — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1973 1466 102.3 — — — — — +30 — 44.0% -0.56 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1974 1483 100.4 — — — — — +33 — 40.0% -1.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1975 1667 123.4 — — — — — +28 -100 56.6% +0.36 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1976 1653 123.0 — — — — -39 +22 -101 47.4% -0.24 6–6 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 105.0 +0.87 1989 2082 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
27 1977 1612 114.1 — — — — — +52 -147 38.6% -0.90 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 102.1 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1978 1605 119.3 — — — — +79 +51 -122 49.3% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 +2.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1979 1594 107.1 — — — — +95 — — 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.2 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1980 1707 133.4 — — — — +7 +67 — 62.6% +0.85 5–8 (38%) 4–2 (67%) 98.7 +1.99 1993 1973 123.4 — — — — +28 — — 46.4% -0.97 3–1 (75%) — — -0.65
31 1981 1637 110.6 — — — — +67 +56 — 42.2% -0.47 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +2.47 1994 1852 118.5 — — — — +78 +126 — 36.7% -0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -1.54
32 1982 1548 102.2 — — — — +97 +36 — 45.5% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 +2.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1983 1553 103.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–1 — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1984 1536 106.9 — — — — +81 — — 35.7% -1.29 1–1 — — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1769 120.8 — — — — +49 +43 -114 47.9% -0.29 38–42 (48%) 23–21 (52%) 99.5 +7.49 — 2522 175.8 — — — — +83 -173 -353 76.3% +2.13 52–25 (68%) 33–14 (70%) 108.9 -5.99

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.