H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Heidi Eisterlehner vs Virginia Ruzici H2H: 0-2
Virginia Ruzici holds a 2–0 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1978 Hamburg third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1978* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Virginia Ruzici | 6-2 6-4 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
| May 13, 1976* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Virginia Ruzici | 6-3 6-2 | Heidi Eisterlehner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heidi Eisterlehner | — | — | — | 1,774 | 112 | 127 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Virginia Ruzici | #264 | #16 | 5 | 2,121 | 458 | 274 | 62.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Heidi Eisterlehner | Virginia Ruzici | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 59–26 | 69.4% | — | 2,093 | 1 | 8 |
| 24 | 1974 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 52–27 | 65.8% | — | 1,966 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 1975 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 73–26 | 73.7% | — | 2,027 | 1 | 12 |
| 26 | 1976 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 61–30 | 67.0% | — | 1,920 | 1 | 14 |
| 27 | 1977 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 18 |
| 28 | 1978 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,905 | 1 | 19 |
| 29 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #44 | 1,780 | 1 | 19 |
| 30 | 1980 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,786 | 1 | 20 |
| 31 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,734 | 1 | 20 |
| 32 | 1982 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #143 | 1,658 | 1 | 20 |
| 33 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |