H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Heidi Eisterlehner vs Virginia Ruzici H2H: 0-2

Virginia Ruzici holds a 2–0 lead over Heidi Eisterlehner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1978 Hamburg Open round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Heidi Eisterlehner
GER Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Virginia Ruzici
ROU Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Ruzici 6-2 6-4 Heidi Eisterlehner Match data May 18, 1978* R32 Hamburg Open WTA 250 Clay
Virginia Ruzici 6-3 6-2 Heidi Eisterlehner Match data May 13, 1976* R64 Bournemouth WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Heidi Eisterlehner — — — 1,773 114 128 47.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Virginia Ruzici #264 #16 5 2,123 455 274 62.4% 1 0 0 1 17 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Virginia Ruzici
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1973 4–9 30.8% — 1,493 0 0
19 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0 1974 20–18 52.6% — 1,647 0 2
20 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,507 0 0 1975 7–7 50.0% — 1,686 0 3
21 — — — — — — — 1976 30–20 60.0% — 1,797 0 3
22 1972 0–5 0.0% — 1,438 0 0 1977 23–21 52.3% — 1,919 0 4
23 1973 5–6 45.5% — 1,466 0 0 1978 59–26 69.4% — 2,092 1 8
24 1974 2–2 50.0% — 1,482 0 0 1979 52–27 65.8% — 1,974 1 8
25 1975 13–9 59.1% — 1,666 0 2 1980 73–26 73.7% — 2,031 1 12
26 1976 15–19 44.1% — 1,652 0 2 1981 58–30 65.9% — 1,919 1 13
27 1977 11–15 42.3% — 1,611 0 2 1982 49–21 70.0% — 1,983 1 17
28 1978 14–15 48.3% — 1,608 0 2 1983 27–17 61.4% — 1,905 1 18
29 1979 4–6 40.0% — 1,596 0 2 1984 21–23 47.7% #44 1,780 1 18
30 1980 27–17 61.4% — 1,709 0 3 1985 27–19 58.7% #48 1,786 1 19
31 1981 7–12 36.8% — 1,638 0 3 1986 0–2 0.0% #185 1,734 1 19
32 1982 10–12 45.5% — 1,548 0 3 1987 5–7 41.7% #143 1,657 1 19
33 1983 1–2 33.3% — 1,553 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 1984 2–4 33.3% — 1,536 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Virginia Ruzici
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
19 1969 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
20 1970 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 28 12 40 70.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1972 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5%
23 1973 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 14 9 23 60.9% 19 4 23 82.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 11 27 59.3%
24 1974 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 15 9 24 62.5%
25 1975 — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 14 5 19 73.7% 27 5 32 84.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 24 11 35 68.6%
26 1976 3 1 4 75.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 27 8 35 77.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 16 13 29 55.2%
27 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 10 5 15 66.7% 24 5 29 82.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9%
28 1978 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
29 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1984 2 6 8 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7%
30 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1985 7 6 13 53.8% 17 6 23 73.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
31 1981 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 8 9 17 47.1% 72 73 145 49.7% 9 25 34 26.5% 23 18 41 56.1% — 69 55 124 55.6% 218 85 303 71.9% 43 34 77 55.8% 114 96 210 54.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Heidi Eisterlehner Virginia Ruzici
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1484 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1494 102.8 — — — — +96 -24 — 33.3% -1.19 0–1 0–1 — +0.98
19 1969 1486 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.13 1974 1647 134.9 — — — — -93 +57 -167 56.8% +0.64 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 102.5 +1.04
20 1970 1508 100.6 — — — — — +43 — 50.0% -0.92 — — — +0.52 1975 1686 122.9 — — — — — +81 — 51.6% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.38
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1797 142.1 — — — — -255 +110 -321 58.1% +0.62 9–8 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 100.1 -1.76
22 1972 1439 91.1 — — — — — +19 — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.90 1977 1920 148.2 — — — — -145 +43 — 50.0% +0.01 11–3 (79%) 1–0 — -5.12
23 1973 1466 102.3 — — — — — +30 — 44.0% -0.56 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.42 1978 2092 158.8 — — — — -38 -54 -463 66.3% +1.06 14–6 (70%) 14–6 (70%) 111.1 -7.09
24 1974 1483 100.4 — — — — — +33 — 40.0% -1.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.69 1979 1975 151.3 — — — — +50 +39 -193 63.7% +0.92 15–10 (60%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -3.12
25 1975 1667 123.4 — — — — — +28 -100 56.6% +0.36 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 104.4 +0.92 1980 2032 157.7 — — — — +31 +158 -224 69.9% +1.37 14–9 (61%) 10–7 (59%) 101.1 -5.80
26 1976 1653 123.0 — — — — -39 +22 -102 47.4% -0.24 6–6 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 105.0 +0.96 1981 1919 158.9 — — — — -19 +290 -67 62.6% +0.85 13–7 (65%) 9–6 (60%) 102.2 -6.70
27 1977 1612 114.0 — — — — — +52 -149 38.6% -0.90 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 102.1 +0.42 1982 1984 156.4 — — — — -61 +260 -118 68.6% +1.30 9–11 (45%) 11–6 (65%) 98.3 -4.11
28 1978 1608 119.9 — — — — +85 +48 -126 50.8% -0.09 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 +3.14 1983 1905 143.8 — — — — +21 +136 -21 60.4% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +2.73
29 1979 1596 107.1 — — — — +100 — — 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.1 +1.61 1984 1781 144.3 — — — — -45 +178 — 51.0% +0.29 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 87.0 -0.89
30 1980 1709 134.1 — — — — +20 +64 — 63.5% +0.94 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 99.8 +1.96 1985 1786 140.6 — — — — -87 +216 +68 57.4% +0.63 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 102.6 -0.16
31 1981 1638 110.6 — — — — +76 +55 — 42.2% -0.47 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +2.57 1986 1735 90.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.44
32 1982 1548 102.3 — — — — +106 +36 — 45.5% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 +2.50 1987 1658 111.9 — — — — — +211 — 46.4% -0.14 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.99
33 1983 1553 102.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 1–1 — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1984 1536 106.8 — — — — +87 — — 35.7% -1.29 1–1 — — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1773 121.0 — — — — +58 +42 -116 48.2% -0.26 38–41 (48%) 23–21 (52%) 99.9 +7.72 — 2123 154.7 — — — — -27 +141 -197 61.0% +0.79 108–81 (57%) 70–52 (57%) 104.0 -3.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.