H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Helen Amos vs Julie Heldman H2H: 0-3

Julie Heldman holds a 3–0 lead over Helen Amos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julie Heldman leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Heldman won the 1971 Nottingham Open semifinal 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Helen Amos
AUS Age 78 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Julie Heldman
USA Age 80 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Heldman 6-2 6-0 Helen Amos Match data Jun 12, 1971* SF Nottingham Open WTA 250 Grass
Julie Heldman 6-4 6-2 Helen Amos Match data Jun 26, 1970* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Julie Heldman 6-4 6-2 Helen Amos Match data Jul 20, 1968* QF Gstaad WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Helen Amos — — — 1,588 42 60 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Julie Heldman — — — 2,133 381 159 70.6% 0 0 0 0 21 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Helen Amos Julie Heldman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1968 11–19 36.7% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1969 10–14 41.7% — 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1970 8–13 38.1% — 1,534 0 0 1968 53–15 77.9% — 1,811 0 6
23 1971 9–10 47.4% — 1,541 0 0 1969 74–17 81.3% — 2,020 0 14
24 1972 2–3 40.0% — 1,548 0 0 1970 29–12 70.7% — 1,959 0 15
25 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,570 0 0 1971 41–23 64.1% — 2,031 0 16
26 — — — — — — — 1972 32–26 55.2% — 1,962 0 16
27 — — — — — — — 1973 68–31 68.7% — 2,074 0 19
28 — — — — — — — 1974 60–21 74.1% — 2,089 0 21
29 — — — — — — — 1975 24–14 63.2% — 1,995 0 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Helen Amos Julie Heldman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1968 — — — — 7 14 21 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1969 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1970 3 3 6 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1968 8 3 11 72.7% 37 7 44 84.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1971 5 2 7 71.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1969 13 3 16 81.3% 32 4 36 88.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 16 6 22 72.7%
24 1972 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1970 — — — — 19 6 25 76.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1973 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1971 6 3 9 66.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 11 4 15 73.3% 13 10 23 56.5%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 5 3 8 62.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 15 11 26 57.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 10 4 14 71.4% 17 7 24 70.8% 24 6 30 80.0% 17 14 31 54.8%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 24 10 34 70.6% 21 5 26 80.8% 15 6 21 71.4%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 11 5 16 68.8%
Career — 9 9 18 50.0% 13 29 42 31.0% 17 19 36 47.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — 46 19 65 70.8% 155 52 207 74.9% 85 33 118 72.0% 89 54 143 62.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Helen Amos Julie Heldman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1968 1484 98.3 — — — — — -16 +20 37.9% -0.95 4–2 (67%) — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1969 1510 110.1 — — — — -30 -6 +22 46.2% -0.46 2–4 (33%) — — +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1970 1534 111.0 — — — — +1 -72 +23 37.8% -0.89 2–1 (67%) — — +0.48 1968 1811 138.4 — — — — -128 +140 -203 73.8% +2.05 10–3 (77%) — — -1.49
23 1971 1542 107.1 — — — — +69 -120 +33 46.5% -0.09 3–2 (60%) — — +3.20 1969 2021 153.7 — — — — +84 +69 -264 74.9% +2.13 16–5 (76%) — — -8.73
24 1972 1549 108.6 — — — — — -109 — 40.0% -0.80 — — — +0.35 1970 1960 152.1 — — — — — +143 -157 70.9% +1.83 3–5 (38%) — — -3.54
25 1973 1571 103.3 — — — — +69 — — 57.1% 0.00 1–0 — — +0.91 1971 2032 159.2 — — — — +11 +32 -114 62.0% +1.18 10–8 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 97.7 -6.66
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1963 153.4 — — — — +119 +20 -75 55.3% +0.34 7–9 (44%) 4–0 (100%) 98.9 -9.20
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 2075 159.9 — — — — -31 -45 +40 66.5% +1.41 12–9 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 97.9 -10.33
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2090 159.9 — — — — -2 -3 +79 69.7% +1.48 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 102.8 -5.94
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1995 149.5 — — — — +96 -22 — 59.0% +0.87 6–3 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 98.1 -3.41
Career — 1588 108.5 — — — — +28 -40 +24 42.3% -0.61 12–9 (57%) — — +6.00 — 2134 158.8 — — — — +33 +56 -56 67.3% +1.47 75–48 (61%) 14–18 (44%) 100.6 -9.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.