H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Helen Amos vs Lea Pericoli H2H: 0-1

Lea Pericoli holds a 1–0 lead over Helen Amos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Pericoli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1968 Cairo round of 16 6-4 6-2.

AUS Age 78 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
ITA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Pericoli 6-4 6-2 Helen Amos Match data Mar 5, 1968* R16 Cairo WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Helen Amos 1,588 42 60 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lea Pericoli 1,772 58 51 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Helen Amos Lea Pericoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1968 11–19 36.7% 1,484 0 0
21 1969 10–14 41.7% 1,509 0 0
22 1970 8–13 38.1% 1,534 0 0
23 1971 9–10 47.4% 1,541 0 0
24 1972 2–3 40.0% 1,548 0 0
25 1973 2–1 66.7% 1,570 0 0
33 1968 8–5 61.5% 1,586 0 1
34 1969 15–7 68.2% 1,705 0 2
35 1970 11–7 61.1% 1,756 0 3
36 1971 9–8 52.9% 1,752 0 3
37 1972 3–6 33.3% 1,659 0 3
38 1973 4–3 57.1% 1,648 0 3
39 1974 6–6 50.0% 1,641 0 3
40 1975 2–7 22.2% 1,554 0 3
41 1976 0–2 0.0% 1,548 0 3

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Helen Amos Lea Pericoli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1968 1484 98.3 -16 +20 37.9% -0.95 4–2 (67%) -0.11
21 1969 1510 110.1 -30 -6 +22 46.2% -0.46 2–4 (33%) +1.11
22 1970 1534 111.0 +1 -72 +23 37.8% -0.89 2–1 (67%) +0.48
23 1971 1542 107.1 +69 -120 +33 46.5% -0.09 3–2 (60%) +3.20
24 1972 1549 108.6 -109 40.0% -0.80 +0.35
25 1973 1571 103.3 +69 57.1% 0.00 1–0 +0.91
33 1968 1586 120.0 +5 +12 70.8% +1.92 1–1 +0.13
34 1969 1705 134.1 +26 67.3% +1.55 2–3 (40%) -1.00
35 1970 1757 135.6 -3 -150 60.5% +1.24 3–1 (75%) -0.73
36 1971 1752 125.6 +1 50.0% +0.08 3–1 (75%) -0.10
37 1972 1659 111.6 +28 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.57
38 1973 1648 114.4 +17 80.0% +2.50 +1.43
39 1974 1642 116.2 +20 51.7% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.98
40 1975 1555 100.4 +15 33.3% -1.19 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +1.40
41 1976 1548 102.8 0.0% -3.50 -0.12
Career 1588 108.5 +28 -40 +24 42.3% -0.61 12–9 (57%) +6.00 1773 132.2 +5 +14 -150 56.0% +0.67 12–14 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 +2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.