H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Helen Kelesi vs Ann Grossman H2H: 2-0
Helen Kelesi holds a 2–0 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Helen Kelesi leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Helen Kelesi won the 1994 Oklahoma fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 1994* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Helen Kelesi | 6-3 6-4 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
| Jun 6, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Helen Kelesi | 6-1 6-2 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helen Kelesi | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |