H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Helen Kelesi vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 3-1
Helen Kelesi holds a 3–1 lead over Bettina Fulco in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Helen Kelesi leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Helen Kelesi won the 1990 Amelia Island fourth round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1990* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Helen Kelesi | 6-2 7-6 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
| May 12, 1989* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Bettina Fulco | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
| Oct 19, 1986* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Helen Kelesi | 6-2 6-2 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1986* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Helen Kelesi | 6-3 6-3 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helen Kelesi | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |