H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Helen Kelesi vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 2-2

Helen Kelesi and Claudia Porwik are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Claudia Porwik leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Helen Kelesi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Claudia Porwik won the 1991 Boca Raton fourth round 6-4 7-5.

CAN Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
GER Age 57

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 8, 1991* Boca Raton WTA 1000 R16 Hard Claudia Porwik #89 6-4 7-5 Helen Kelesi #18 Match data
Mar 19, 1990* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Claudia Porwik #33 6-4 6-1 Helen Kelesi #18 Match data
Mar 23, 1989* Key Biscayne WTA 250 R32 Hard Helen Kelesi #16 1-6 6-4 7-5 Claudia Porwik #112 Match data
Jan 1, 1987* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Grass Helen Kelesi #39 6-2 4-6 6-4 Claudia Porwik #96 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Helen Kelesi #755 #13 54 1,958 213 164 56.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Claudia Porwik #579 #29 148 1,788 114 146 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Helen Kelesi Claudia Porwik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1985 15–15 50.0% #48 1,642 0 0
16 1986 28–21 57.1% #39 1,745 0 1
17 1987 22–19 53.7% #32 1,785 0 1 1986 6–5 54.5% #96 1,576 0 0
18 1988 33–18 64.7% #19 1,848 0 2 1987 13–19 40.6% #104 1,582 0 0
19 1989 36–18 66.7% #13 1,873 0 2 1988 11–16 40.7% #68 1,572 0 0
20 1990 23–17 57.5% #25 1,785 0 2 1989 19–18 51.4% #75 1,662 0 0
21 1991 26–20 56.5% #29 1,716 0 2 1990 18–17 51.4% #29 1,667 0 0
22 1992 7–13 35.0% #128 1,633 0 2 1991 14–20 41.2% #80 1,645 0 0
23 1993 18–13 58.1% #48 1,756 0 2 1992 12–18 40.0% #98 1,599 0 0
24 1994 5–10 33.3% #125 1,646 0 2 1993 13–20 39.4% #92 1,599 0 0
25 1994 0–1 0.0% #256 1,583 0 0
26 1995 4–7 36.4% #133 1,550 0 0
27 1996 4–5 44.4% #153 1,562 0 0