H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Helen Kelesi vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 0-1
Judith Wiesner holds a 1–0 lead over Helen Kelesi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1992 Indian Wells fourth round 5-7 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1992* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Judith Wiesner | 5-7 7-6 6-2 | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helen Kelesi | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |