H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Helen Kelesi vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 2-0
Helen Kelesi holds a 2–0 lead over Noelle Van Lottum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Helen Kelesi leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Helen Kelesi won the 1991 US Open first round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 54
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1991* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Helen Kelesi | 6-3 7-5 | Noelle Van Lottum | Match data |
| Jul 18, 1991* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Helen Kelesi | 6-2 6-2 | Noelle Van Lottum | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Noelle Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,659 | 56 | 96 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helen Kelesi | Noelle Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 1 |