H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Helen Kelesi vs Sandra Wasserman H2H: 2-1
Helen Kelesi holds a 2–1 lead over Sandra Wasserman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Helen Kelesi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Helen Kelesi won the 1993 Pattaya third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 56
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1993* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Helen Kelesi | 6-2 6-3 | Sandra Wasserman | Match data |
| Apr 3, 1991* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Helen Kelesi | 7-5 6-4 | Sandra Wasserman | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sandra Wasserman | 7-6(1) 2-0 (ret.) | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sandra Wasserman | #747 | #48 | 22 | 1,702 | 77 | 93 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helen Kelesi | Sandra Wasserman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #123 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #63 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #103 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #135 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #112 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |