H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Helen Kelesi vs Susan Sloane Lundy H2H: 2-2
Helen Kelesi and Susan Sloane Lundy are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Helen Kelesi leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Susan Sloane Lundy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Helen Kelesi won the 1989 Nashville semifinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 1989* | Nashville | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Helen Kelesi | 6-2 6-3 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1988* | Nashville | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Susan Sloane Lundy | 6-1 6-3 | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1988* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Helen Kelesi | 6-4 6-3 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
| May 20, 1988* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Susan Sloane Lundy | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Helen Kelesi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helen Kelesi | #755 | #13 | 54 | 1,958 | 213 | 164 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,884 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Helen Kelesi | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1985 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #25 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #29 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #48 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |