H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Helena Sukova vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 0-2

Andrea Jaeger holds a 2–0 lead over Helena Sukova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1983 Chicago round of 16 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Helena Sukova
CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Jaeger 6-1 6-2 Helena Sukova Match data Feb 18, 1983* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-2 6-3 Helena Sukova Match data Aug 20, 1982* QF Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Helena Sukova — #4 735 2,219 581 300 65.9% 0 0 0 3 6 9
Andrea Jaeger — #3 — 2,265 262 91 74.2% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Helena Sukova Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1980 67–18 78.8% #7 2,156 0 5
16 1981 6–4 60.0% — 1,584 0 0 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,181 0 8
17 1982 23–23 50.0% — 1,756 0 0 1982 65–21 75.6% #3 2,202 0 10
18 1983 33–20 62.3% — 1,908 0 0 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,105 0 11
19 1984 48–23 67.6% #7 2,042 0 1 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,025 0 11
20 1985 54–21 72.0% #9 2,029 0 1 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,940 0 11
21 1986 69–21 76.7% #5 2,152 0 3 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,915 0 11
22 1987 58–19 75.3% #7 2,129 0 5 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,900 0 11
23 1988 49–20 71.0% #8 2,099 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 1989 39–15 72.2% #8 2,037 0 6 — — — — — — —
25 1990 41–17 70.7% #14 2,024 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 1991 34–18 65.4% #17 1,958 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 1992 39–16 70.9% #12 1,965 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 1993 24–15 61.5% #17 1,922 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1994 21–14 60.0% #22 1,887 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1995 18–15 54.5% #29 1,819 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1996 17–16 51.5% #35 1,776 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1997 8–21 27.6% #80 1,655 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1998 0–2 0.0% — 1,632 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Helena Sukova Andrea Jaeger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 19 7 26 73.1%
16 1981 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9%
17 1982 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6%
18 1983 8 4 12 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1%
19 1984 12 5 17 70.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 18 9 27 66.7% 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 18 5 23 78.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 23 5 28 82.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% 27 10 37 73.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1988 21 9 30 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 26 6 32 81.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 16 6 22 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 20 7 27 74.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 2 11 13 15.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 213 105 318 67.0% 75 53 128 58.6% 125 49 174 71.8% 164 90 254 64.6% — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 21 87 75.9% 50 14 64 78.1% 80 34 114 70.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Helena Sukova Andrea Jaeger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1522 115.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2157 165.9 — — — — -8 -425 -301 74.7% +1.98 9–3 (75%) 6–1 (86%) 114.0 -6.95
16 1981 1585 127.9 — — — — — — +53 59.1% +0.91 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.29 1981 2182 174.7 — — — — +39 -160 -157 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.7 -9.51
17 1982 1757 137.6 — — — — -65 -78 -97 48.2% -0.15 11–7 (61%) 4–7 (36%) 105.6 -2.70 1982 2203 174.6 — — — — +59 -31 -141 73.9% +1.87 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.79
18 1983 1908 149.5 — — — — -86 -98 -128 59.7% +0.67 8–5 (62%) 6–8 (43%) 102.3 -1.78 1983 2105 170.2 — — — — -3 +149 +46 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 -4.08
19 1984 2042 155.1 — — — — -97 -323 +11 60.7% +0.75 20–6 (77%) 9–10 (47%) 108.1 -2.57 1984 2025 144.9 — — — — +15 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.43
20 1985 2029 162.5 — — — — -21 -243 +105 68.7% +1.34 9–7 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 101.9 -3.41 1985 1940 112.8 — — — — +12 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.48
21 1986 2152 173.7 — — — — +12 -258 +28 73.5% +1.77 11–9 (55%) 7–9 (44%) 97.6 -7.09 1986 1915 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
22 1987 2130 165.0 — — — — +24 -243 +119 69.5% +1.40 17–7 (71%) 11–4 (73%) 105.2 -5.12 1987 1901 104.0 — — — — — +248 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.19
23 1988 2099 164.3 — — — — +36 -123 +88 67.1% +1.03 10–4 (71%) 14–3 (82%) 109.6 -5.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1989 2037 158.2 — — — — +98 -141 +86 67.5% +1.04 9–3 (75%) 10–3 (77%) 106.3 -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 2025 160.0 — — — — +47 -104 +169 64.7% +0.88 13–4 (76%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 1959 153.8 — — — — +56 -27 +161 63.2% +1.02 9–6 (60%) 5–7 (42%) 95.3 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 1966 153.3 — — — — +48 -63 +184 69.2% +1.42 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 +2.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1922 151.2 — — — — +11 — +198 60.2% +0.82 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 94.8 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1887 144.4 — — — — +13 -45 +168 56.1% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 97.3 +1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1820 144.1 — — — — +24 +33 +209 53.9% +0.05 7–5 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 105.6 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1776 135.6 — — — — +9 -3 +296 50.6% +0.28 7–6 (54%) 4–4 (50%) 97.0 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 1655 126.9 — — — — -12 +65 +386 32.3% -1.05 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 92.0 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1633 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.34 0–2 — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2219 162.4 — — — — +11 -125 +96 62.6% +0.89 156–93 (63%) 105–89 (54%) 103.0 -3.04 — 2266 172.3 — — — — +22 -43 -157 71.0% +1.71 46–18 (72%) 22–18 (55%) 109.1 -8.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.