H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Helena Sukova vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 0-2
Andrea Jaeger holds a 2–0 lead over Helena Sukova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1983 Chicago fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 1983* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Andrea Jaeger | 6-1 6-2 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
| Aug 20, 1982* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Andrea Jaeger | 6-2 6-3 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| Andrea Jaeger | #225 | #3 | — | 2,280 | 257 | 90 | 74.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helena Sukova | Andrea Jaeger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 62–18 | 77.5% | — | 2,169 | 0 | 4 |
| 16 | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,179 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 65–20 | 76.5% | — | 2,170 | 0 | 9 |
| 18 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,091 | 0 | 10 |
| 19 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,015 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 10 |
| 21 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,907 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |