H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Helena Sukova vs Barbara Gerken H2H: 1-0

Helena Sukova holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Gerken in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1988 Tokyo Pan Pacific round of 16 3-6 7-6 6-2.

CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Helena Sukova #7 3-6 7-6 6-2 Barbara Gerken Match data Apr 29, 1988* R16 Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Helena Sukova — #4 735 2,219 581 300 65.9% 0 0 0 3 6 9
Barbara Gerken — — — 1,650 64 97 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Helena Sukova Barbara Gerken
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1981 6–4 60.0% — 1,584 0 0 1981 8–2 80.0% — 1,631 0 0
17 1982 23–23 50.0% — 1,756 0 0 1982 1–5 16.7% — 1,578 0 0
18 1983 33–20 62.3% — 1,908 0 0 1983 5–4 55.6% — 1,618 0 0
19 1984 48–23 67.6% #7 2,042 0 1 1984 9–16 36.0% — 1,581 0 0
20 1985 54–21 72.0% #9 2,029 0 1 1985 11–22 33.3% — 1,577 0 0
21 1986 69–21 76.7% #5 2,152 0 3 1986 12–18 40.0% — 1,564 0 0
22 1987 58–19 75.3% #7 2,129 0 5 1987 16–19 45.7% — 1,635 0 0
23 1988 49–20 71.0% #8 2,099 0 5 1988 2–10 16.7% — 1,527 0 0
24 1989 39–15 72.2% #8 2,037 0 6 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,507 0 0
25 1990 41–17 70.7% #14 2,024 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 1991 34–18 65.4% #17 1,958 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 1992 39–16 70.9% #12 1,965 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 1993 24–15 61.5% #17 1,922 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1994 21–14 60.0% #22 1,887 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1995 18–15 54.5% #29 1,819 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1996 17–16 51.5% #35 1,776 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1997 8–21 27.6% #80 1,655 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1998 0–2 0.0% — 1,632 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Helena Sukova Barbara Gerken
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1981 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1981 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1983 8 4 12 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1984 12 5 17 70.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 18 9 27 66.7% 1984 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
20 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 18 5 23 78.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 1985 3 10 13 23.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1986 23 5 28 82.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% 27 10 37 73.0% 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
22 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 1987 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1988 21 9 30 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 1988 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1989 26 6 32 81.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 16 6 22 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 20 7 27 74.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 2 11 13 15.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 213 105 318 67.0% 75 53 128 58.6% 125 49 174 71.8% 164 90 254 64.6% — 33 48 81 40.7% 5 13 18 27.8% 7 20 27 25.9% 15 15 30 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Helena Sukova Barbara Gerken
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1981 1585 127.9 — — — — — — +53 59.1% +0.91 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.29 1981 1632 123.7 — — — — +57 — — 73.7% +1.32 1–0 2–0 — +0.08
17 1982 1757 137.6 — — — — -65 -78 -97 48.2% -0.15 11–7 (61%) 4–7 (36%) 105.6 -2.70 1982 1578 106.0 — — — — +38 — — 33.3% -1.67 0–3 (0%) — — +0.29
18 1983 1908 149.5 — — — — -86 -98 -128 59.7% +0.67 8–5 (62%) 6–8 (43%) 102.3 -1.78 1983 1618 117.4 — — — — +40 — — 52.2% +0.91 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.01
19 1984 2042 155.1 — — — — -97 -323 +11 60.7% +0.75 20–6 (77%) 9–10 (47%) 108.1 -2.57 1984 1582 114.0 — — — — +13 +5 -7 41.2% -0.51 0–3 (0%) 1–6 (14%) 91.5 +0.86
20 1985 2029 162.5 — — — — -21 -243 +105 68.7% +1.34 9–7 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 101.9 -3.41 1985 1577 123.0 — — — — +20 — -44 38.9% -0.56 2–6 (25%) 4–6 (40%) 96.8 +0.93
21 1986 2152 173.7 — — — — +12 -258 +28 73.5% +1.77 11–9 (55%) 7–9 (44%) 97.6 -7.09 1986 1565 106.1 — — — — +19 -88 -13 42.9% -0.56 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.1 +4.13
22 1987 2130 165.0 — — — — +24 -243 +119 69.5% +1.40 17–7 (71%) 11–4 (73%) 105.2 -5.12 1987 1636 119.3 — — — — +36 — -173 48.8% -0.23 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 98.1 +2.46
23 1988 2099 164.3 — — — — +36 -123 +88 67.1% +1.03 10–4 (71%) 14–3 (82%) 109.6 -5.08 1988 1528 96.1 — — — — +42 — -125 25.9% -1.96 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.89
24 1989 2037 158.2 — — — — +98 -141 +86 67.5% +1.04 9–3 (75%) 10–3 (77%) 106.3 -1.38 1989 1508 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.30
25 1990 2025 160.0 — — — — +47 -104 +169 64.7% +0.88 13–4 (76%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 -0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1991 1959 153.8 — — — — +56 -27 +161 63.2% +1.02 9–6 (60%) 5–7 (42%) 95.3 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 1966 153.3 — — — — +48 -63 +184 69.2% +1.42 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 +2.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1922 151.2 — — — — +11 — +198 60.2% +0.82 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 94.8 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1887 144.4 — — — — +13 -45 +168 56.1% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 97.3 +1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1820 144.1 — — — — +24 +33 +209 53.9% +0.05 7–5 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 105.6 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1776 135.6 — — — — +9 -3 +296 50.6% +0.28 7–6 (54%) 4–4 (50%) 97.0 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 1655 126.9 — — — — -12 +65 +386 32.3% -1.05 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 92.0 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1633 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.34 0–2 — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2219 162.4 — — — — +11 -125 +96 62.6% +0.89 156–93 (63%) 105–89 (54%) 103.0 -3.04 — 1651 118.6 — — — — +29 -22 -60 43.5% -0.45 15–30 (33%) 12–23 (34%) 88.2 +6.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.