H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Helena Sukova vs Debbie Graham H2H: 1-0

Helena Sukova holds a 1–0 lead over Debbie Graham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1992 Sydney International round of 32 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Helena Sukova
CZE Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Debbie Graham
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Helena Sukova #17 7-5 6-4 Debbie Graham #35 Match data Jan 9, 1992* R32 Sydney International Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Helena Sukova #102 #4 735 2,218 581 300 65.9% 0 0 0 3 6 9
Debbie Graham #729 #35 190 1,757 83 90 48.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Helena Sukova Debbie Graham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1981 6–4 60.0% — 1,584 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
17 1982 23–23 50.0% — 1,756 0 0 1988 3–2 60.0% #138 1,547 0 0
18 1983 33–20 62.3% — 1,907 0 0 1989 2–4 33.3% #256 1,512 0 0
19 1984 48–23 67.6% #7 2,041 0 1 1990 5–4 55.6% #121 1,581 0 0
20 1985 54–21 72.0% #9 2,028 0 1 1991 14–11 56.0% #42 1,685 0 0
21 1986 69–21 76.7% #5 2,151 0 3 1992 21–19 52.5% #51 1,728 0 0
22 1987 58–19 75.3% #7 2,129 0 5 1993 21–22 48.8% #65 1,683 0 0
23 1988 49–20 71.0% #8 2,098 0 5 1994 8–10 44.4% #68 1,698 0 0
24 1989 39–15 72.2% #8 2,036 0 6 1995 4–12 25.0% #131 1,598 0 0
25 1990 41–17 70.7% #14 2,024 0 6 1996 4–5 44.4% #122 1,607 0 0
26 1991 34–18 65.4% #17 1,958 0 7 — — — — — — —
27 1992 39–16 70.9% #12 1,965 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 1993 24–15 61.5% #17 1,922 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1994 21–14 60.0% #22 1,887 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1995 18–15 54.5% #29 1,819 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1996 17–16 51.5% #35 1,776 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 1997 8–21 27.6% #80 1,655 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 1998 0–2 0.0% #102 1,632 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Helena Sukova Debbie Graham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1981 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 5 5 10 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 9 16 43.8% 1988 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 8 4 12 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1989 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1984 12 5 17 70.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 18 9 27 66.7% 1990 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 18 5 23 78.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 23 5 28 82.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% 27 10 37 73.0% 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1987 15 6 21 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1988 21 9 30 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 1994 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
24 1989 26 6 32 81.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1996 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1991 16 6 22 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 20 7 27 74.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 2 11 13 15.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 213 105 318 67.0% 75 53 128 58.6% 125 49 174 71.8% 164 90 254 64.6% — 54 50 104 51.9% 19 21 40 47.5% 1 8 9 11.1% 9 11 20 45.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Helena Sukova Debbie Graham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1981 1584 127.8 — — — — — — +54 59.1% +0.91 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.28 1987 1502 96.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.39
17 1982 1756 137.3 — — — — -64 -77 -97 48.2% -0.15 11–7 (61%) 4–7 (36%) 105.5 -2.58 1988 1548 116.6 — — — — +36 — — 58.3% +0.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.73
18 1983 1907 149.3 — — — — -85 -97 -127 59.7% +0.67 8–5 (62%) 6–8 (43%) 102.3 -2.48 1989 1512 95.4 — — — — +58 — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +1.17
19 1984 2042 154.9 — — — — -99 -323 +10 60.7% +0.75 20–6 (77%) 9–10 (47%) 108.0 -2.37 1990 1582 122.4 — — — — +23 -2 — 52.4% -0.52 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.27
20 1985 2029 162.4 — — — — -21 -243 +104 68.7% +1.34 9–7 (56%) 9–7 (56%) 101.9 -3.44 1991 1686 138.0 — — — — +16 -85 — 56.6% +0.40 1–4 (20%) 3–0 (100%) 98.8 +1.00
21 1986 2152 173.6 — — — — +12 -258 +29 73.5% +1.77 11–9 (55%) 7–9 (44%) 97.5 -7.60 1992 1729 136.9 — — — — +3 -79 — 51.6% +0.15 7–6 (54%) 4–4 (50%) 100.3 -1.24
22 1987 2130 164.9 — — — — +25 -243 +121 69.5% +1.40 17–7 (71%) 11–4 (73%) 105.2 -4.98 1993 1684 134.3 — — — — +3 +30 — 49.5% -0.04 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 -0.72
23 1988 2099 164.2 — — — — +36 -123 +89 67.1% +1.03 10–4 (71%) 14–3 (82%) 109.5 -5.27 1994 1699 133.9 — — — — +10 — — 48.8% -0.05 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +0.20
24 1989 2037 158.2 — — — — +97 -141 +86 67.5% +1.04 9–3 (75%) 10–3 (77%) 106.3 -1.47 1995 1599 119.1 — — — — +85 +25 — 37.1% -0.69 0–5 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 90.6 -0.23
25 1990 2025 160.0 — — — — +46 -104 +169 64.7% +0.88 13–4 (76%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 -0.53 1996 1608 118.4 — — — — +59 — — 42.9% +0.10 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.30
26 1991 1958 153.8 — — — — +56 -26 +161 63.2% +1.02 9–6 (60%) 5–7 (42%) 95.3 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 1966 153.3 — — — — +48 -64 +185 69.2% +1.42 7–5 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 +2.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1922 151.2 — — — — +11 — +198 60.2% +0.82 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 94.8 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1887 144.4 — — — — +13 -45 +168 56.1% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 97.3 +1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1820 144.1 — — — — +24 +33 +207 53.9% +0.05 7–5 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 105.6 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1776 135.6 — — — — +9 -3 +295 50.6% +0.28 7–6 (54%) 4–4 (50%) 97.0 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 1655 126.9 — — — — -12 +65 +386 32.3% -1.05 2–7 (22%) 2–3 (40%) 92.0 -0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1632 97.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.34 0–2 — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2218 162.3 — — — — +10 -125 +96 62.6% +0.89 156–93 (63%) 105–89 (54%) 103.0 -3.16 — 1757 137.8 — — — — +19 -14 — 49.4% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 14–14 (50%) 96.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.