H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Helena Sukova vs Debbie Spence Nasim H2H: 2-0
Helena Sukova holds a 2–0 lead over Debbie Spence Nasim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1985 Monticello quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 58
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 1985* | Monticello | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Helena Sukova | 6-4 6-2 | Debbie Spence Nasim | Match data |
| Feb 22, 1985* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Helena Sukova | 6-1 4-6 6-1 | Debbie Spence Nasim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| Debbie Spence Nasim | — | — | — | 1,837 | 56 | 62 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Helena Sukova | Debbie Spence Nasim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–22 | 37.1% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |